[Testing] JavaScript Mocking Fundamentals
Ensure Functions are Called Correctly with JavaScript Mocks
Often when writing JavaScript tests and mocking dependencies, you’ll want to verify that the function was called correctly. That requires keeping track of how often the function was called and what arguments it was called with. That way we can make assertions on how many times it was called and ensure it was called with the right arguments.
Function to be mocked: utils.js
// returns the winning player or null for a tie
// Let's pretend this isn't using Math.random() but instead
// is making a call to some third party machine learning
// service that has a testing environment we don't control
// and is unreliable so we want to mock it out for tests.
function getWinner(player1, player2) {
const winningNumber = Math.random();
return winningNumber < 1 / 3
? player1
: winningNumber < 2 / 3
? player2
: null;
} module.exports = {getWinner};
Implementaion: thumbwar.js
const utils = require("./utils"); function thumbWar(player1, player2) {
const numberToWin = 2;
let player1Wins = 0;
let player2Wins = 0;
while (player1Wins < numberToWin && player2Wins < numberToWin) {
const winner = utils.getWinner(player1, player2);
if (winner === player1) {
player1Wins++;
} else if (winner === player2) {
player2Wins++;
}
}
return player1Wins > player2Wins ? player1 : player2;
} module.exports = thumbWar;
Testing:
const thumbWar = require("./thumbwar");
const utils = require("./utils");
const assert = require("assert"); test("returns winner", () => {
const originalGetWinner = utils.getWinner;
utils.getWinner = jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
// check the params are correct
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
// check the fn has been called number of times
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
// check each time call the fn with the correct params
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW"); utils.getWinner = originalGetWinner;
});
Here we are using 'jest.fn' to mock the function.
We can also create a mock fn by ourselves.
function fn(impl) {
const mockFn = (...args) => {
mockFn.mock.calls.push(args);
return impl(...args);
};
mockFn.mock = {calls: []};
return mockFn;
}
test("returns winner: fn", () => {
const originalGetWinner = utils.getWinner;
utils.getWinner = fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
assert.strictEqual(winner, "KCD");
assert.deepStrictEqual(utils.getWinner.mock.calls, [
["KCD", "KW"],
["KCD", "KW"],
]);
utils.getWinner = originalGetWinner;
});
Restore the Original Implementation of a Mocked JavaScript Function with jest.spyOn
With our current usage of the mock function we have to manually keep track of the original implementation so we can cleanup after ourselves to keep our tests idempotent (moonkey patching). Let’s see how jest.spyOn can help us avoid the bookkeeping and simplify our situation.
test("returns winner", () => {
//const originalGetWinner = utils.getWinner;
//utils.getWinner = jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
jest.spyOn(utils, "getWinner");
utils.getWinner.mockImplementation((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW"); // utils.getWinner = originalGetWinner;
utils.getWinner.mockRestore();
});
Here we are using jest.spyOn function.
We can also write spyOn function by ourselves.
function fn(impl = () => {}) {
const mockFn = (...args) => {
mockFn.mock.calls.push(args);
mockFn.mockImplementation = newImpl => (impl = newImpl);
return impl(...args);
};
mockFn.mock = {calls: []};
return mockFn;
} function spyOn(obj, prop) {
// store the origianl fn
const originalValue = obj[prop];
// assign new mock fn
obj[prop] = fn;
// add restore fn
obj[prop].mockRestore = () => (obj[prop] = originalValue);
} test("returns winner: fn", () => {
spyOn(utils, "getWinner");
utils.getWinner.mockImplementation = fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
assert.strictEqual(winner, "KCD");
assert.deepStrictEqual(utils.getWinner.mock.calls, [
["KCD", "KW"],
["KCD", "KW"],
]);
utils.getWinner.mockRestore();
});
Mock a JavaScript module in a test
So far we’re still basically monkey-patching the utils module which is fine, but could lead to problems in the future, especially if we want to mock a ESModule export which doesn’t allow this kind of monkey-patching on exports. Instead, let’s mock the entire module so when our test subject requires the file they get our mocked version instead.
To mock a whole module. we can use 'jest.mock':
const thumbWar = require("./thumbwar");
const utils = require("./utils");
const assert = require("assert"); jest.mock("./utils", () => {
return {
getWinner: jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1), // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
};
}); test("returns winner", () => { const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW"); utils.getWinner.mockReset();
});
Now we don't need to mock the 'getWinner' function inside test, 'jest.mock' can be used anywhere, jest will make sure it mock will be hoisted to the top.
Make a shared JavaScript mock module
Often you’ll want to mock the same file throughout all the tests in your codebase. So let’s make a shared mock file in Jest's __mocks__
directory which Jest can load for us automatically.
__mocks__/utils.js:
module.exports = {
getWinner: jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1), // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
};
const thumbWar = require("../thumbwar");
const utils = require("../utils");
const assert = require("assert"); jest.mock("../utils"); test("returns winner", () => {
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW"); utils.getWinner.mockReset();
});
[Testing] JavaScript Mocking Fundamentals的更多相关文章
- Googletest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework
Googletest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework https://github.com/google/googletest
- [Testing] Static Analysis Testing JavaScript Applications
The static code analysis and linting tool ESLint is the de-facto standard for linting JavaScript pro ...
- 12款简化 Web 开发的 JavaScript 开发框架
前端框架简化了开发过程中,像 Bootstrap 和 Foundation 就是前端框架的佼佼者.在这篇文章了,我们编制了一组新鲜的,实用的,可以帮助您建立高质量的 Web 应用程序的 JavaScr ...
- JavaScript测试工具比较: QUnit, Jasmine, and Mocha
1. QUnit A JavaScript Unit Testing framework. QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testi ...
- 15款加速 Web 开发的 JavaScript 框架
JavaScript 可以通过多种方式来创建交互式的网站和 Web 应用程序.利用 JavaScript,可以让你移动 HTML 元素,创建各种各样的自定义动画,给你的访问者更好的终端用户体验. 对于 ...
- 关于JavaScript测试工具:QUnit, Jasmine, MoCha
在进行前端开发过程中,在某些场景下,需要通过编写单元测试来提高代码质量.而JavaScript常用的单元测试框架有这几个:QUnit, Jasmine, MoCha.下面就基于这三个工具,简单做一比较 ...
- Top JavaScript Frameworks, Libraries & Tools and When to Use Them
It seems almost every other week there is a new JavaScript library taking the web community by storm ...
- 近期流行的JavaScript框架与主题
[新年快乐]2017年你应该关注的JavaScript框架与主题 2017-01-01 王下邀月熊 JavaScript JavaScript的繁荣促生了很多优秀的技术.框架与工具库,这空前的繁荣也给 ...
- JavaScript引擎基本原理: 优化prototypes
原文链接: JavaScript engine fundamentals: optimizing prototypes 这篇文章介绍了一些JavaScript引擎常用的优化关键点, 并不只是Bened ...
随机推荐
- FIFO设计思考之一
不管同步FIFO还是异步FIFO,设计难点是full/empty状态flag的正确性. 要保证任何情况 FULL时NO WRITE,EMPTY时NO READ.overflow / underflow ...
- 《嵌入式linux应用程序开发标准教程》笔记——8.进程间通信
, 8.1 概述 linux里使用较多的进程间通信方式: 管道,pipe和fifo,管道pipe没有实体文件,只能用于具有亲缘关系的进程间通信:有名管道 named pipe,也叫fifo,还允许无亲 ...
- python+ selenium 实现简历自动刷新
本文用到的文件的下载地址 百度网盘链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1wIda-wUz4X_Ck72xgZ6Ddg 提取码: etaa 1 安装Python 和 selenium ...
- centos 7.3 快速安装ceph
Ceph的部署手册(Centos7.3) Ceph简介 Ceph是一种为优秀的性能.可靠性和可扩展性而设计的统一的.分布式文件系统. 部署逻辑架构 准备3台主机,并且修改主机名(hostnam ...
- Python9-反射-day27(大年初三)
复习 class 类名(父类,父类2): 静态属性 = '' #静态属性 类属性 def __init__(self): #初始化方法 self.name = 'alex' def func(self ...
- 经典:区间dp-合并石子
题目链接 :http://acm.nyist.edu.cn/JudgeOnline/problem.php?pid=737 这个动态规划的思是,要得出合并n堆石子的最优答案可以从小到大枚举所有石子合并 ...
- Java单例模式简单实现
代码 public class Singleton { private static Singleton singleton;//创建一个单例对象 public static Singleton ge ...
- 数据库质疑或只有MDF文件资料
--允许进行系统表的操作 use master declare @databasename varchar(255) set @databasename='Blwy BarCode' --1.如果用户 ...
- 大数据学习——scala入门程序
安装scala.msi https://blog.csdn.net/sinat_32867867/article/details/80305302 notepad++ object HelloScal ...
- 【EF 1】EF实体框架 原理+实例
一.知识回顾 到目前为止,自己学到的链接数据库操作已经经历了几个阶段,分别是:学生信息管理和(第一次)机房收费时的直接连接数据库操作表格,然后是机房个人重构中应用的操作实体,在其中还利用了一个很重要的 ...