library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待
1.现象:
客户10.2.0.4 RAC环境，出现大量的library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待，经分析是由于统计信息收集僵死导致的。
数据库在8点到9点期间，数据库两个节点都存在明显的cursor: pin S wait on X和library cache lock的等待：
TOP 5 EVENT:
|
Event |
Waits |
Time(s) |
Avg Wait(ms) |
% Total Call Time |
Wait Class |
|
cursor: pin S wait on X |
1,573,056 |
30,651 |
19 |
146.2 |
Concurrency |
|
library cache lock |
31,757 |
7,009 |
221 |
33.4 |
Concurrency |
|
CPU time |
6,416 |
30.6 |
|||
|
DFS lock handle |
12,381 |
2,979 |
241 |
14.2 |
Other |
|
latch: library cache |
1,646 |
1,974 |
1,199 |
9.4 |
Concurrency |
|
Event |
Waits |
Time(s) |
Avg Wait(ms) |
% Total Call Time |
Wait Class |
|
cursor: pin S wait on X |
17,586,451 |
342,437 |
19 |
812.1 |
Concurrency |
|
library cache lock |
63,657 |
30,153 |
474 |
71.5 |
Concurrency |
|
CPU time |
3,820 |
9.1 |
|||
|
db file sequential read |
241,761 |
1,094 |
5 |
2.6 |
User I/O |
|
inactive session |
两个节点的等待现象基本一致，而节点1上还存在明显的DFS lock handle等待事件。
通过分析ASH信息，发现library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待基本上都是6点之后才开始出现：
2.分析原因
SELECT trunc(sample_time, 'hh24') TIME, COUNT(*)
FROM WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY ash, wrh$_event_name en
WHERE ash.event_id = en.event_id
AND sample_time>= to_timestamp('', 'yyyymmdd')
AND event_name IN ('cursor: pin S wait on X', 'library cache lock')
GROUP BY trunc(sample_time, 'hh24')
ORDER BY 1;
查询事件发生的情况
而观察出现cursor: pin S wait on X和library cache lock等待会话的BLOCKING SESSION，发现大部分处于等待的会话被会话37锁定：
SELECT to_char(sample_time, 'hh24:mi:ss.ff') TIME, session_id sid,
decode(en.event_name, 'cursor: pin S wait on X', to_number(substr(ltrim(to_char(p2, '0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx')), 1, 8), 'xxxxxxxx'), blocking_session) b_sid,
en.event_name
FROM WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY ash, wrh$_event_name en
WHERE ash.event_id = en.event_id(+)
AND instance_number = 1
AND sample_time >= to_timestamp('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
AND sample_time <= to_timestamp('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
ORDER BY 1;
查询堵塞事件
TIME SID B_SID EVENT_NAME
------------------ ---------- ---------- ------------------------------
08:00:09.569 457 4294967291 latch: library cache
08:00:09.569 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:09.569 1763 4294967291 SQL*Net message FROM client
08:00:09.569 123 4294967295 kksfbc child completion
08:00:09.569 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:09.569 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:09.569 327 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:09.569 233 4294967291 db file scattered READ
08:00:09.569 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:09.569 1889 4294967291 gc CURRENT block 2-way
08:00:09.569 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:19.669 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 233 4294967291 db file scattered READ
08:00:19.669 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:19.669 1763 4294967291 db file sequential READ
08:00:19.669 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:19.669 457 4294967291 kksfbc child completion
08:00:19.669 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:19.669 654 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:19.669 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:19.669 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:29.769 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 457 4294967291 kksfbc child completion
08:00:29.769 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:29.769 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:29.769 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:29.769 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:29.769 654 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:29.769 327 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:29.769 1763 4294967291 db file sequential READ
08:00:29.769 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 123 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:29.769 196 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:29.769 233 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:29.769 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:39.879 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:39.879 658 4294967291 db file sequential READ
08:00:39.879 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:39.879 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:39.879 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:39.879 1849 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:39.879 327 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:39.879 235 4294967291 rdbms ipc reply
08:00:39.879 19 4294967291 rdbms ipc reply
08:00:39.879 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:39.879 123 4294967294 enq: WF - contention
08:00:49.987 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:49.987 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:49.987 382 4294967291 gc cr block busy
08:00:49.987 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:49.987 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:49.987 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:49.987 235 4294967295 kksfbc child completion
08:00:49.987 658 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:49.987 19 4294967291 latch: library cache
08:00:49.987 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:49.987 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:49.987 1889 4294967291 SQL*Net message FROM client
08:00:49.987 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:49.987 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
查询结果
可以判断，导致数据库实例HANG死的原因是因为SID为73的进程：
SELECT to_char(sample_time, 'hh24:mi:ss'), program, action, event_name
FROM wrh$_active_session_history ash, wrh$_event_name en
WHERE session_id = 73
AND ash.event_id = en.event_id(+)
AND sample_time >= to_date('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
AND sample_time <= to_date('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
ORDER BY 1;
查询该会话运行的程序
TO_CHAR( PROGRAM ACTION EVENT_NAME
-------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------------------------
05:50:07 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:50:17 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:50:27 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:50:37 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:50:47 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc cr block 2-way
05:50:57 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:51:08 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:51:18 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:51:28 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc cr multi block request
05:51:38 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB direct path WRITE temp
05:51:48 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:51:58 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:08 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:18 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:52:28 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:52:38 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:49 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:59 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:53:09 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:53:19 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:53:29 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:53:39 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:53:49 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc CURRENT GRANT 2-way
05:53:59 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:09 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:20 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:30 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:40 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:50 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:00 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:10 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:55:20 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:30 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:40 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:51 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:01 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:11 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:21 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:31 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:41 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:51 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc CURRENT GRANT 2-way
05:57:01 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB library cache pin
05:57:11 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
05:57:21 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
05:57:32 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:57:42 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:57:52 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
05:58:02 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:58:12 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:58:22 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:58:32 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:58:42 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:58:52 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:03 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:13 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:23 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:33 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:43 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:59:53 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
06:00:03 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:13 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
06:00:23 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:34 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:44 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:54 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB
查询结果
根据MOS文档，Bug 6011045 – DBMS_STATS causes deadlock between ‘cursor: pin S wait on X’ and ‘library cache lock’ [ID 6011045.8]，这个问题是RAC环境中Oracle收集统计信息的BUG，在自动收集数据字典信息时，可能会出现进程HANG死，并导致大量的library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待，此外还可能出现DFS lock handle以及row cache lock的等待。
这个BUG确认影响版本包括10.2.0.4和10.2.0.5，这个BUG Oracle在10.2.0.5.5 PSU中进行了修复。
library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待的更多相关文章
- 关于library cache lock和row cache lock产生的常见原因
这两个等待事件其实很少出现在top5列表中,一般都没什么印象,在此整理记录以便以后查阅. 常见的library cache lock产生的原因在<高级OWI与Oracle性能调查>这本书和 ...
- 如何使用event 10049分析定位library cache lock and library cache pin
Oracle Library Cache 的 lock 与 pin 说明 一. 相关的基本概念 之前整理了一篇blog,讲了Library Cache 的机制,参考: Oracle Library c ...
- impdp时卡住,DW等待library cache lock
同事反映impdp时在SCHEMA_REPORT/TYPE/TYPE_SPEC步骤卡住,1个多小时后也没有响应, 查下v$session: select program,sid, event,bloc ...
- Library cache lock/pin详解
Library cache lock/pin 一.概述 ---本文是网络资料加metalink 等整理得来一个实例中的library cache包括了不同类型对象的描述,如:游标,索引,表,视图,过程 ...
- 外键约束列并没有导致大量建筑指数library cache pin/library cache lock
外键约束列并没有导致大量建筑指数library cache pin/library cache lock 清除一个100大数据表超过一百万线,发现已经运行了几个小时: delete B001.T_B1 ...
- Library Cache: Lock, Pin and Load Lock
What is "Library cache lock" ? This event controls the concurrency between clients of the ...
- Library cache lock 故障解决一例
今天收到同事电话,说是数据库中一张名为acct_balance进行操作是奇慢,第一反映是不是扫行计划有问题,结果我错了,现将过程记录下来. 用pl/sql连上数据库情况:1.对acct_balance ...
- Performance tuning library cache lock & single-task message
My colleague suddenly encountered a problem today,a Database becomes very slow , and the a lot of se ...
- 深入理解shared pool共享池之library cache的library cache lock系列四
本文了解下等待事件library cache lock,进一步理解library cache,之前的文章请见: 深入理解shared pool共享池之library cache的library ca ...
随机推荐
- HTTP协议中TCP的三次握手，四次挥手总结
建立TCP需要三次握手才能建立,而断开连接则需要四次挥手.整个过程如下图所示: 先来看看如何建立连接的. 首先Client端发送连接请求报文,Server段接受连接后回复ACK报文,并为这次连接分配资 ...
- hdu2023 求平均成绩 ~~很闲~~~
#include<iostream> #include<stdio.h> #include<math.h> #include<string.h> #in ...
- MainWndProc运行观察
MainWndProc运行观察 把MainWndProc改写成如下代码,便于观察:procedure TWinControl.MainWndProc(var Message: TMessage);be ...
- asp.net+swfupload 多图片批量上传(附源码下载)
asp.net的文件上传都是单个文件上传方式,无法执行一次性多张图片批量上传操作,要实现多图片批量上传需要借助于flash,通过flash选取多个图片(文件),然后再通过后端服务进行上传操作. 本次教 ...
- iOS tintColor解析
在UIView中一个相对来说比较小的属性,tintColor属性是相当的强大.今天我们就来看看如何使用他,包含使用tint color进行着色标准控件.我们自定义控件甚至重新着色图像. 本章的实例程序 ...
- Echarts事件
Echart饼图.柱状图.折线图(pie.bar.line)添加点击事件发布日期:2014年08月10日 来源:PHP1.CN 点击:250638摘要:var myChart= echar ...
- ubuntu下如何快速加密可移动存储设备
ubuntu下可以快速加密U盘和其他移动存储设备.访问的时候会要你输入密码,这样就比较安全了. ubuntu的磁盘工具使用的是LUKS加密,虽然这个加密方法不跟其他系统兼容,但可以在其他试用GNOME ...
- jQuery-瀑布流-绝对定位布局（二）(延迟AJAX加载图片)
jQuery-瀑布流-绝对定位布局(二)(延迟AJAX加载图片) 瀑布流-绝对定位布局,与浮动布局的区别在于 1.布局不一样: 绝对定位:一个UL里面放置所有的绝对定位的LI: 浮动布局:多个(一 ...
- AdventureWorksDW2008R2 attach: Unable to open the physical file. Operating system error 5: "5(Access is denied.)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26014133/adventureworksdw2008r2-attach-unable-to-open-the-physica ...
- Ext的正则表达式
http://www.cnblogs.com/azai/archive/2010/12/31/1923140.html 今天看到一篇关于Extjs正则表达式比较系统的总结. 使用extJs时能常用 ...