上周五一哥们发了条SQL,让我看看,代码如下:

SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM (select m.sheet_id
from cpm_main_sheet_history m, cpm_service_warn_config s
where m.sheet_type_id in
(select t.row_id
from tbl_class_trees t
start with t.row_id = s.sheet_type_id
connect by t.parent_row_id = prior t.row_id)
and m.service_type in
(select tt.row_id
from tbl_class_trees tt
start with tt.row_id = s.business_type_id
connect by tt.parent_row_id = prior tt.row_id)
and m.accept_time >=
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE - time_interval / 24, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and s.row_id = 'AS170904165251'
and m.no_area in ('0000')) c__ --执行计划
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2710926849 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 143 | 96246 (1)| 00:19:15 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1681 | 234K| 746 (1)| 00:00:09 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CPM_SERVICE_WARN_CONFIG | 1 | 56 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_CONFIG_ROW_ID | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CPM_MAIN_SHEET_HISTORY | 1681 | 142K| 745 (1)| 00:00:09 |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CPM_NO_AREA_TIME1 | 449 | | 62 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 8 | CONNECT BY NO FILTERING WITH SW (UNIQUE)| | | | | |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBL_CLASS_TREES | 9527 | 493K| 113 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 10 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 11 | CONNECT BY NO FILTERING WITH SW (UNIQUE)| | | | | |
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBL_CLASS_TREES | 9527 | 493K| 113 (0)| 00:00:02 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 1 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "TBL_CLASS_TREES" "T" WHERE "T"."ROW_ID"=:B1 START WITH "T"."ROW_ID"=:B2
CONNECT BY "T"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "T"."ROW_ID") AND EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "TBL_CLASS_TREES" "TT" WHERE
"TT"."ROW_ID"=:B3 START WITH "TT"."ROW_ID"=:B4 CONNECT BY "TT"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "TT"."ROW_ID"))
4 - access("S"."ROW_ID"='AS170904165251')
6 - access("M"."ACCEPT_TIME">=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE@!-"TIME_INTERVAL"/24,'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
"M"."NO_AREA"='0000' AND "M"."ACCEPT_TIME" IS NOT NULL)
filter("M"."NO_AREA"='0000')
7 - filter("T"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
8 - access("T"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "T"."ROW_ID")
filter("T"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
10 - filter("TT"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
11 - access("TT"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "TT"."ROW_ID")
filter("TT"."ROW_ID"=:B1)

SQL优化前:

耗时:20s

count(1)返回: 147条数据

分析执行计划,执行计划中有filter关键字且有3个子级,这种sql是最容易引起性能问题的,所以第一时间是反应是sql有没有走索引,能不能改写。

尝试1:

建索引优化:

在TBL_CLASS_TREES表(row_id,parent_row_id)上建索引
执行计划:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 135779572 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 155 | 34147 (1)| 00:06:50 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3021 | 457K| 816 (1)| 00:00:10 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CPM_SERVICE_WARN_CONFIG | 1 | 62 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_CONFIG_ROW_ID | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CPM_MAIN_SHEET_HISTORY | 3021 | 274K| 815 (1)| 00:00:10 |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CPM_NO_AREA_TIME1 | 563 | | 136 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 7 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 8 | CONNECT BY NO FILTERING WITH SW (UNIQUE)| | | | | |
| 9 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | IDX_ROW_ID | 9527 | 493K| 20 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 11 | CONNECT BY NO FILTERING WITH SW (UNIQUE)| | | | | |
| 12 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | IDX_ROW_ID | 9527 | 493K| 20 (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 1 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "TBL_CLASS_TREES" "T" WHERE "T"."ROW_ID"=:B1 START WITH "T"."ROW_ID"=:B2
CONNECT BY "T"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "T"."ROW_ID") AND EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "TBL_CLASS_TREES" "TT" WHERE
"TT"."ROW_ID"=:B3 START WITH "TT"."ROW_ID"=:B4 CONNECT BY "TT"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "TT"."ROW_ID"))
4 - access("S"."ROW_ID"='AS170904165251')
6 - access("M"."ACCEPT_TIME">=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE@!-"TIME_INTERVAL"/24,'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
"M"."NO_AREA"='0000' AND "M"."ACCEPT_TIME" IS NOT NULL)
filter("M"."NO_AREA"='0000')
7 - filter("T"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
8 - access("T"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "T"."ROW_ID")
filter("T"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
10 - filter("TT"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
11 - access("TT"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "TT"."ROW_ID")
filter("TT"."ROW_ID"=:B1) --效果还是一样慢,此优化失败。

尝试2:

利用with改写sql优化

with t as (select /*+ materialize */ row_id,parent_row_id from tbl_class_trees)
SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM (select m.sheet_id
from cpm_main_sheet_history m,cpm_service_warn_config s
where m.sheet_type_id in
(select t.row_id
from t
start with t.row_id = s.sheet_type_id
connect by t.parent_row_id = prior t.row_id)
and m.service_type in
(select t.row_id
from t
start with t.row_id = s.business_type_id
connect by t.parent_row_id = prior t.row_id)
and m.accept_time >=
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE - time_interval / 24, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and s.row_id = 'AS170904165251'
and m.no_area in ('0000')) c__ --效果还是一样慢,此优化失败。

再次分析原SQL执行计划:

id=8,id=11的执行计划关键词是:CONNECT BY NO FILTERING WITH SW (UNIQUE)。
这个为树形查询在11g中的新特性,尝试让sql不使用这个新特性。 于是使用以下hint:/*+ connect_by_filtering */ 进行优化: SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM (select m.sheet_id
from cpm_main_sheet_history m, cpm_service_warn_config s
where m.sheet_type_id in
(select /*+ connect_by_filtering */ t.row_id
from tbl_class_trees t
start with t.row_id = s.sheet_type_id
connect by t.parent_row_id = prior t.row_id)
and m.service_type in
(select /*+ connect_by_filtering */ tt.row_id
from tbl_class_trees tt
start with tt.row_id = s.business_type_id
connect by tt.parent_row_id = prior tt.row_id)
and m.accept_time >=
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE - time_interval / 24, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and s.row_id = 'AS170904165251'
and m.no_area in ('0000')) c__ PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2824841339 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 246 | 188K (1)| 00:37:47 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3021 | 725K| 816 (1)| 00:00:10 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CPM_SERVICE_WARN_CONFIG | 1 | 106 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_CONFIG_ROW_ID | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CPM_MAIN_SHEET_HISTORY | 3021 | 413K| 815 (1)| 00:00:10 |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CPM_NO_AREA_TIME1 | 563 | | 136 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 7 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 8 | CONNECT BY WITH FILTERING | | | | | |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TBL_CLASS_TREES | 1 | 107 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_TBL_CLASS_TREESS | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | | | | |
| 12 | CONNECT BY PUMP | | | | | |
| 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBL_CLASS_TREES | 6 | 318 | 113 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 14 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 15 | CONNECT BY WITH FILTERING | | | | | |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TBL_CLASS_TREES | 1 | 107 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_TBL_CLASS_TREESS | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | HASH JOIN | | | | | |
| 19 | CONNECT BY PUMP | | | | | |
| 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBL_CLASS_TREES | 6 | 318 | 113 (0)| 00:00:02 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 1 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT /*+ CONNECT_BY_FILTERING */ 0 FROM "TBL_CLASS_TREES" "T" WHERE
"T"."ROW_ID"=:B1 START WITH "T"."ROW_ID"=:B2) AND EXISTS (SELECT /*+ CONNECT_BY_FILTERING */ 0
FROM "TBL_CLASS_TREES" "TT" WHERE "TT"."ROW_ID"=:B3 START WITH "TT"."ROW_ID"=:B4))
4 - access("S"."ROW_ID"='AS170904165251')
6 - access("M"."ACCEPT_TIME">=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE@!-"TIME_INTERVAL"/24,'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
AND "M"."NO_AREA"='0000' AND "M"."ACCEPT_TIME" IS NOT NULL)
filter("M"."NO_AREA"='0000')
7 - filter("T"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
8 - access("T"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "T"."ROW_ID")
10 - access("T"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
11 - access("T"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "T"."ROW_ID")
14 - filter("TT"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
15 - access("TT"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "TT"."ROW_ID")
17 - access("TT"."ROW_ID"=:B1)
18 - access("TT"."PARENT_ROW_ID"=PRIOR "TT"."ROW_ID") --优化后,SQL能在5s返回结果

树形查询SQL优化一例的更多相关文章

  1. 跨服务器查询sql语句样例

    若2个数据库在同一台机器上:insert into DataBase_A..Table1(col1,col2,col3----)select col11,col22,col33-- from Data ...

  2. 跨服务器查询sql语句样例(转)

    若2个数据库在同一台机器上: insert into DataBase_A..Table1(col1,col2,col3----) select col11,col22,col33-- from Da ...

  3. oracle 11g亿级复杂SQL优化一例(数量级性能提升)

    自从16年之后,因为工作原因,项目中就没有再使用oracle了,最近最近支持一个项目,又要开始负责这块事情了.最近在跑性能测试,配置全部调好之后,不少sql还存在性能低下的问题,主要涉及执行计划的不合 ...

  4. 查询SQL优化

    SQL优化的一般步骤 通过show status命令了解各种SQL的执行频率定位执行效率较低的SQL语句,重点select通过explain分析低效率的SQL确定问题并采取相应的优化措施 优化措施 s ...

  5. 反连接NOT EXISTS子查询中有or 谓词连接条件SQL优化一例

    背景 今天在日常数据库检查中,发现一SQL运行时间特别长,于是抓取出来,进行优化. 优化前: 耗时:503s 返回:0 SQL代码 SELECT * FROM MM_PAYABLEMONEY_TD P ...

  6. 1 min 数据查询 SQL 优化

    问题 前几天线上数据库 IOPS 飙升,一直居高不下,最近并没有升级.遂查看数据库正在执行的 SQL 语句,发现有个查询离线设备的语句极其缓慢. 探寻原因 SELECT o.* FROM ( SELE ...

  7. mysql联合查询sql优化

    我们在使用mysql数据库时,经常会使用到mysql的联合查询,联合查询分为内连接和外连接,内连接查询结果是联合的表都存在匹配才会有结果,外连接则根据驱动表是否存在匹配来生成结果集. 这里使用mysq ...

  8. oracle查询SQL优化相当重要

    如果表中的时间字段是索引,那么时间字段不要使用函数,函数会使索引失效. 例如: select * from mytable where trunc(createtime)=trunc(sysdate) ...

  9. Mysql 分页查询sql优化

    先查下数据表的总条数: SELECT COUNT(id) FROM ts_translation_send_address 执行分页界SQL 查看使用时间2.210s SELECT * FROM ts ...

随机推荐

  1. CodeForces 730A Toda 2 (模拟)

    题意:给定一个序列,现在你每次至多给5个人的权值减小1,最少2个人,最小是0,使得剩下的所有权值都相等且尽量大. 析:用multiset来模拟,每次取权值最大的三个或者两个,直到最后相等.我开始没有这 ...

  2. bzoj 1006: [HNOI2008]神奇的国度【弦图+LesBFS】

    参考论文:https://wenku.baidu.com/view/6f9f2223dd36a32d73758126.html 参考代码:http://hzwer.com/3500.html 虽然会写 ...

  3. jrebel永久免费使用教程,这个标题怎么样?不能带“激活”俩字?

    文章转载自:https://www.jiweichengzhu.com/article/33c0330308f5429faf7a1e74127c9708 如果还有问题,加群交流:686430774(就 ...

  4. Linux之旅第一篇-目录结构及操作目录

    一.引言 Linux对java开发来说也是一项必备的技能,因为项目基本都是部署在Linux操作系统的服务器中,虽然项目不一定需要我们去部署,但不管是自己测试环境部署,还是一些生产环境中日志的查看,Li ...

  5. ES高级查询

    Query Content 在查询过程中,除了判断文档是否满足查询条件外,ES还会计算一个_score来标识匹配的程度,旨在判断目标文档和查询条件的匹配有多好 # POST 192.168.100.1 ...

  6. BZOJ2006 超级钢琴

    Description ​ 给定一个长度为n的区间,询问前k大的区间和,区间长度\(\in [L, R]\). $ n, k <= 500000$ Solution ​ 首先求前缀和.把一个区间 ...

  7. [Usaco2005 Jan]Muddy Fields泥泞的牧场

    Description 雨连续不断的击打了放牛的牧场,一个R行C列的格子(1<=R<=50,1<=C<=50).虽然这对草来说是件好事,但这却使得一些没有草遮盖的土地变得很泥泞 ...

  8. HTML/XML转义字符对照表

    HTML/XML转义字符对照表 HTML/XML转义字符对照表包含符号.数学符号.希腊字母 .重要的国际标志.ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1)字符集.特殊符号等. 1.特殊字符转义表 字符 十 ...

  9. [转]在asp.net mvc中使用PartialView返回部分HTML段

    本文转自:http://blog.csdn.net/sandy945/article/details/6307750 问题链接: MVC如何实现异步调用输出HTML页面 该问题是个常见的 case, ...

  10. 前端css3样式前缀自动补全工具--autoprefixer

    最近在学习一份来自git的动画框架源码,看懂70%的核心代码后,打算自己动手实践一版,然鹅,所有框架搭起来以后,在动画这块却出了问题: 想设计一个slideInLeft的动画,必然想到了要从偏移-10 ...