Handling of asynchronous events---reference
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/lk/lk-12.html
12. Handling of asynchronous events
One wants to be notified of various events, like data that has become available, files that have changed, and signals that have been raised. FreeBSD has the nicekqueue API. Let us discuss the Unix/Linux situation.
It is easy to wait for a single event. Usually one does a (blocking) read()
, and that is it.
Many mechanisms exist to wait for any of a set of events, or just to test whether anything interesting happened.
12.1 O_NONBLOCK
If the open()
call that opened a file includes the O_NONBLOCK flag, the file is opened in non-blocking mode. Neither the open()
nor any subsequent operations on the returned file descriptor will cause the calling process to wait.
A nonblocking open is useful (i) in order to obtain a file descriptor for subsequent use when no I/O is planned, e.g. for ioctl()
calls to get or set properties of a device; especially on device files, an ordinary open might have unwanted side effects, such as a tape rewind etc. (ii) when reading from a pipe: the read will return immediately when no data is available; when writing to a pipe: the write will return immediately (without writing anything) when there are no readers.
O_NOACCESS
An obscure Linux feature is that one can open a file with the O_NOACCESS flag (defined as 3, where O_RDONLY is 0, O_WRONLY is 1 and O_RDWR is 2). In order to open a file with this mode, one needs both read and write permission. This had the same purpose: announce that no reading or writing was going to be done, and only a file descriptor for ioctl use was needed. (Used in LILO, fdformat, and a few similar utilities.)
People would love to have this facility also for directories, so that one could do a fd = open(".", O_NOACCESS)
, go elsewhere, and return by fchdir(fd)
. But an O_NOACCESS open fails on directories.
12.2 select
The select()
mechanism was introduced in 4.2BSD. The prototype of this system call is
int select(int nfds, fd_set *restrict readfds,
fd_set *restrict writefds, fd_set *restrict errorfds,
struct timeval *restrict timeout);
It allows one to specify three sets of file descriptors (as bit masks) and a timeout. The call returns when the timeout expires or when one of the file descriptors inreadfds
has data available for reading, one of those in writefds
has buffer space available for writing, or an error occurred for one of those in errorfds
. Upon return, the file descriptor sets and the timeout are rewritten to indicate which file descriptor has the stated condition, and how much time from the timeout is left. (Note that other Unix-type systems do not rewrite the timeout.)
There are two select system calls. The old one uses a parameter block, the new one uses five parameters. Otherwise they are equivalent.
12.3 pselect
The pselect
system call was added in Linux 2.6.16 (and was present earlier elsewhere). With only select()
it is difficult, almost impossible, to handle signals correctly. A signal handler itself cannot do very much: the main program is in some unknown state when the signal is delivered. The usual solution is to only raise a flag in the signal handler, and test that flag in the main program.
int gotsignal = 0; void sighand(int x) {
gotsignal = 1;
} int main() {
...
signal(SIGINT, sighand);
while (1) {
if (gotsignal) ...
select();
...
}
Now if one wants to wait for either a signal or some event on a file descriptor, then testing the flag and if it is not set calling select()
has a race: maybe the signal arrived just after the flag was tested and just before select was called, and the program may hang in select()
without reacting to the signal.
The call pselect()
is designed to solve this problem. This function is just like select()
but has prototype
int pselect(int nfds, fd_set *restrict readfds,
fd_set *restrict writefds, fd_set *restrict errorfds,
const struct timespec *restrict timeout,
const sigset_t *restrict sigmask);
with a sixth parameter sigmask
, and it does the equivalent of
sigset_t origmask; sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, &origmask);
ready = select(nfds, &readfds, &writefds, &exceptfds, timeout);
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &origmask, NULL);
as an atomic action. Now one can block the signals of interest until the call of pselect()
and have a sigmask
that unblocks them. If a signal occurs, the call will return with errno
set to EINTR.
This function uses a struct timespec (with nanoseconds) instead of a struct timeval (with microseconds), and does not update its value on return.
The self-pipe trick
Before the introduction of pselect()
people resorted to obscure tricks to obtain the same effect. Famous is Daniel Bernstein's self-pipe trick: create a non-blocking pipe, and add a file descriptor for reading from this pipe to the readfds
argument of select()
. In the signal handler, write a byte to the pipe. This works.
The system call
The pselect system call has a 7-parameter prototype (the 7th parameter being the size of the 6th sigmask
parameter), but most architectures cannot handle 7-parameter system calls, so there is also a 6-parameter version where the 6th parameter is a pointer to a struct that has the last two parameters. Unlike the POSIX library routine, the system call does return the leftover part of the timeout.
This system call starts changing the signal mask, and ends restoring it. However, if it was interrupted by a signal, this signal should be delivered, while the signal mask might block it. This is solved by the recent TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
mechanism in the kernel. When the pselect system call returns after being interrupted by a signal, it does not immediately restore the original signal mask, but first runs the user's signal handler, and first upon return from that the original signal mask is restored.
12.4 poll
The poll()
system call is rather similar to select()
. The prototype is
struct pollfd {
int fd; /* file descriptor */
short events; /* requested events */
short revents; /* returned events */
}; int poll(struct pollfd *fds, nfds_t nfds, int timeout);
where the fields events
amd revents
are bitmasks indicating for what events fd
should be watched, and what conditions actually occurred. The timeout is in milliseconds; a negative number means an infinite timeout.
ppoll
Just like pselect
is a version of select that allows safe handling of signals, ppoll
is such a version of poll
. The prototype is
int ppoll(struct pollfd *fds, nfds_t nfds,
const struct timespec *timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask);
12.5 epoll
When the number of file descriptors becomes very large, the select()
and poll()
mechanisms become inefficient. With N descriptors, O(N) information must be copied from user space to kernel and vice versa, and loops of length O(N) are needed to test the conditions.
Solaris introduced the /dev/poll
mechanism (see poll(7d)
on Solaris), where the idea is that one does the copy from user space to kernel only once (by writing an array of struct pollfd's to /dev/poll
) and gets only interesting information back (via an ioctl on this device that copies the interesting struct pollfd back to userspace).
Linux tries something similar using the three system calls epoll_create
, epoll_ctl
, epoll_wait
(added in 2.5.44, see epoll(7)
). Benchmarks seem to indicate that the performance is comparable to that of select and poll until one has thousands of descriptors, only a small fraction of which is ready. (And then epoll is clearly better.) In most tests, the FreeBSD kqueue wins.
For a discussion of these and several other mechanisms, especially for the context of web servers, see the C10K site.
epoll_pwait
Just like pselect
and ppoll
are versions of select
and poll
, there is (since 2.6.19) a epoll_pwait
version of epoll_wait
that includes a signal mask.
12.6 dnotify
The above was about notification about file descriptors that become ready for I/O. A different type of notification is that about file system events. In 2.4.0-test9 the dnotify feature was introduced. Today it is obsoleted by inotify
(see below). See Documentation/dnotify.txt
and fs/dnotify.c
.
The idea was that one could register interest in changes in a directory dir
using fd = open(dir, O_RDONLY)
followed by fcntl(fd, F_NOTIFY, ...)
. Notification occurs via delivery of a signal.
/* dnotify demo, basically from Documentation/dnotify.txt */
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h> static volatile int dir_fd; /* A very weak interface: we report that something changed, but
the only info is in which directory, but not what the change is. */
static void handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *data) {
dir_fd = si->si_fd;
} int main(void) {
struct sigaction act;
int fd; act.sa_sigaction = handler;
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
sigaction(SIGRTMIN + 1, &act, NULL); fd = open(".", O_RDONLY);
fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, SIGRTMIN + 1);
fcntl(fd, F_NOTIFY,
DN_MODIFY|DN_CREATE|DN_DELETE|DN_RENAME|DN_MULTISHOT); while (1) {
pause();
printf("Got some event on fd=%d\n", dir_fd);
}
}
There are many problems with this interface. It can only watch directories. If one wants to watch many directories, it takes many file descriptors. Moreover, the open file pins the filesystem so that it cannot be unmounted. When something happens it is unknown what, and a stat()
on all files of interest is needed. The communication mechanism, signals, is unfortunate. Dnotify is obsolete now.
12.7 inotify
(Since 2.6.13.) Inotify is implemented using three new system calls and the usual read()
, poll()
, close()
calls:
int inotify_init(void);
int inotify_add_watch (int fd, const char *pathname, int mask);
int inotify_rm_watch (int fd, int wd);
The first returns a file descriptor: fd = inotify_init()
. The second tells what to watch, and what to watch for, and returns a watch descriptor: wd = inotify_add_watch(fd, "/home/aeb", IN_CREATE | IN_DELETE)
. The file descriptor fd
can be used in a read()
call, and then returns an array of struct inotify_event's. One can use select()
and poll()
on it. A watch is removed by inotify_rm_watch(fd,wd)
. The inotify instance is closed by close(fd)
.
An inotify_event is defined by
struct inotify_event {
int wd; /* Watch descriptor */
uint32_t mask; /* Mask of events */
uint32_t cookie; /* Unique cookie associating related
events (for rename(2)) */
uint32_t len; /* Size of 'name' field */
char name[]; /* Optional null-terminated name */
};
The name
field defines the file involved, when one is watching a directory.
There is a /proc
interface with settable limits:
% ls /proc/sys/fs/inotify/
max_queued_events max_user_instances max_user_watches
% cat $_/*
16384
128
8192
Applications are inotify-tools, gamin and Beagle.
/* inotify demo, mimicking the above dnotify one */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <sys/inotify.h> #define BUFSZ 16384 static void errexit(char *s) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", s);
exit(1);
} int main(void) {
int ifd, wd, i, n;
char buf[BUFSZ]; ifd = inotify_init();
if (ifd < 0)
errexit("cannot obtain an inotify instance"); wd = inotify_add_watch(ifd, ".", IN_MODIFY|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE);
if (wd < 0)
errexit("cannot add inotify watch"); while (1) {
n = read(ifd, buf, sizeof(buf));
if (n <= 0)
errexit("read problem"); i = 0;
while (i < n) {
struct inotify_event *ev; ev = (struct inotify_event *) &buf[i];
if (ev->len)
printf("file %s %s\n", ev->name,
(ev->mask & IN_CREATE) ? "created" :
(ev->mask & IN_DELETE) ? "deleted" :
"modified");
else
printf("unexpected event - wd=%d mask=%d\n",
ev->wd, ev->mask); i += sizeof(struct inotify_event) + ev->len;
}
printf("---\n");
}
}
Handling of asynchronous events---reference的更多相关文章
- (C#) Handling and Raising Events
Handling and Raising Events .NET Framework 4.5 Other Versions 6 out of 20 rated this helpful - ...
- Java Concurrency In Practice - Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1. A (Very) Brief History of Concurrency motivating factors for multiple programs to execute simul ...
- select&pselect/poll&ppoll/epoll
select/pselect, poll和epoll的区别 select,epoll,poll比较 select,poll,epoll进化 Handling of asynchronous event ...
- Combine 框架,从0到1 —— 1.核心概念
本文首发于 Ficow Shen's Blog,原文地址: Combine 框架,从0到1 -- 1.核心概念. 内容概览 前言 核心概念 RxSwift Combine 总结 参考内容 ...
- How does a single thread handle asynchronous code in JavaScript?
原文:https://www.quora.com/How-does-a-single-thread-handle-asynchronous-code-in-JavaScript ----------- ...
- PatentTips - Use of multiple virtual machine monitors to handle privileged events
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION A conventional virtual-machine monitor (VMM) typically runs on a compute ...
- Spring Events
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-events by Eugen Paraschiv Spring+ I just announced the new Learn Spr ...
- asynchronous vs non-blocking
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2625493/asynchronous-vs-non-blocking In many circumstances they a ...
- Patterns for Asynchronous MVVM Applications: Commands
Stephen Cleary Download the Code Sample This is the second article in a series on combining async an ...
随机推荐
- 新入门PGSQL数据库(尝试利用PGPOOL实现分布式),摘录笔记
概念: PostgreSQL (pronounced "post-gress-Q-L") is an open source relational database managem ...
- scvmm2008 错误 2912 0x80041001
执行scvmm系列作业时抛出错误 2912 0x80041001. 这个原因是由于主机和vmm通信媒介bits服务挂起所引起的,bits全称Background Intelligent Transfe ...
- [Mac][转] ports命令
[Mac][转] ports命令 安装路径:/opt/local/lib/ 常用命令 port -d selfupdate #升级macport, 如同:cd /usr/ports && ...
- C# try catch finally
抛出异常开销非常大(相对而言),所以不要过多的在程序中使用它们 既然finally一定是要执行的,即使try块中有return
- 第一个.NET Core应用,创建.NET Core命令
打开cmd,依次输入mkdir .project(创建目录),cd .\.project(进入目录),dotnet new(新建初始项目),dotnet restore(还原依赖),dotnet ru ...
- Win7系统下搭建FTP
一.创建FTP站点 1.打开:控制面板---系统和安全---管理工具---Internet 信息服务 2. 建站:右键点击网站---添加FTP站点 3. 输入FTP 站点名称---选择你的 FTP ...
- 「HNOI 2013」比赛
题目链接 戳我 \(Solution\) 这道题观察数据范围发现很小,再看看题目可以发现是搜索. 这题纯搜索会\(T\)所以要加入适当剪枝 如果一个人后面的比赛都赢却依旧到不了目标分数,则直接\(re ...
- 【OCP-12c】CUUG最新考试原题整理及答案(071-9)
9.(5-5) choose the best answerView the Exhibit and examine the structure of the SALES and STORES tab ...
- 【转】WinForm多线程学习文档
源地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/jianglai11/articles/1708330.html 想学习更多,看<Windows 核心编程>
- scrapy框架基于CrawlSpider的全站数据爬取
引入 提问:如果想要通过爬虫程序去爬取”糗百“全站数据新闻数据的话,有几种实现方法? 方法一:基于Scrapy框架中的Spider的递归爬取进行实现(Request模块递归回调parse方法). 方法 ...