ANGULAR 2 FOR REACT DEVELOPERS
Now that Angular 2 is in beta, the time has come for us to drop everything and learn something new, again. The good news is, like React and Angular 1.x, Angular 2 is here to stay for a while so it’s a good investment to become productive with this new framework. React has been on top of the world as of recently, for good reasons, it’s a fantastic approach to building modern web apps. This post is catered to those who are neck-deep in React and what to make an easy transition to Angular 2. This is angular 2 for react developers.
Bootstrapping
Both React and Angular 2 can be used with normal ES5, but most folks use JSX + ES2015 with React and with Angular 2 it’s also recommended to use TypeScript.
> TypeScript is ES2015 + Optional Types
None of those technologies can run natively in any browser, so we must have a build step to compile down to browser ready code. Webpack and/or Gulp are the popular choices for the bundling and building our application code. Once you have your build process, we can bootstrap our app. As far as bootstrapping our first component, things will obviously be different between the two frameworks. If you’re in a hurry and just wanna get started, check out our Angular 2 webpack starter on github.
React
npm install react react-dom core-js
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
import 'core-js' // polyfills
import React, {Component} from 'react'
import {render} from 'react-dom';
class App extends Component {
render() {
return (
<h1>hello world</h1>
);
}
}
render(<App />, document.findElementById('app'));
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div id="app"></div>
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
|
Angular 2
npm install --save angular2 zone.js es6-shim es6-promise es7-reflect-metadata
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
// polyfills
import 'es6-shim';
import 'es6-promise';
import 'es7-reflect-metadata/dist/browser';
import 'zone.js/lib/browser/zone-microtask';
import 'zone.js/lib/browser/long-stack-trace-zone';
// angular2 libs
import {Component} from 'angular2/core';
import {bootstrap} from 'angular2/platform/browser';
@Component({
selector: '#app',
template: `
<h1>hello world</h1>
`
})
class App {}
bootstrap(App);
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div id="app"></div>
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
|
Conceptually nothing has changed as far as the minimal code needed to bootstrap a simple hello world component. Angular 2 requires a list of polyfills to run in the desired configuration. Some of which are already in evergreen browsers. Let’s walk through some of the difference between the two files. With React we use a bit of OOP, object-oriented programming, with extends to mix our App class with Component class. With Angular 2 we use composition over inheritance with the Component decorator to statically read our metadata (selector and template) as well as map its life-cycle API to our App class. The API for Angular 2 is more decoupled from our application code and the framework itself. Although the use decorators in Angular 2 vs extending in react is different, they carry out the same goal of allowing us to use methods provided in the framework. The selector can be any valid css selector, including a tag name, so we can think of it as document.querySelector(selector) where document is the parent component and selector is our component. The template takes advantage of ES2015 multiline strings and not JSX.
Storing state
Modern web development is all about managing state of our applications. In this example we’re going to simplify state management by going over local state and not things like [insert some flux library] that has many different opinions on how to store state. We’re talking more about state local to a component and not application state.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
|
class App extends Component {
state = {message: 'hello'}; // be sure to have proper plugin for babel
render() {
return (
<div>{this.state.message}</div>
);
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
@Component({
selector: '#app',
template: `
<div>{{ state.message }}</div>
`,
})
class App {
state = {message: 'hello'};
}
|
There really isn’t much of a difference here. This is because both React and Angular 2 rely on standards for initializing state. The one thing that did change is the template interpolation. React uses { } where angular sticks to its origin, using {{ }}. Note that there are many ways to initialize state with Angular 2, this method closely relates to React.
Event handlers and state change
With React using JSX and Angular 2 using HTML, there are some differences between the two when it comes to handling DOM events triggered from components.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
class App extends Component {
state = {count: 0}; // be sure to have proper plugin for babel
handleClick(e) {
this.setState({count: this.state.count + 1});
}
render() {
return (
{/* must bind context */}
<button onClick={this.handleClick.bind(this)}>count</button>
{this.state.count}
);
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
@Component({
selector: 'app',
template: `
<div>
<button (click)="handleClick($event)">+1</button>
{{ state.count }}
</div>
`,
})
class App {
state = {count: 0};
handleClick(e) {
this.state.count++;
}
}
|
While React has mapped props on our JSX components to DOM events, Angular 2 uses the DOM event itself. Lets walk through the syntax of how Angular 2 accomplishes that. The (click) is telling angular that we want to bind to the click event on the target element and run the following expression. Although it may look funny,this is valid HTML. It’s not 2003 anymore, so we don’t really check for “valid” HTML anyway. If you simply cannot bear to use this syntax, you can swap out (click) with on-click. This goes for all events, not just click. We now just make a call to our handler handleClick(). Notice we must invoke the callback, unlike React which replies on a reference to the callback. This is because React is registering our handler as the callback for the event while Angular 2 invokes an expression with our component as the context. Making a call to setState() in react triggers an update for our component and if the state has changed, the component renders again. The same happens with Angular 2 except you can change the state directly since the framework is watching the component tree for any changes to its properties.
Data binding with unidirectional data flow
Unidirectional-way data flow makes it simpler for one to reason about application state, but sometimes you need two-way flow. This can’t be more true than when dealing with forms and user input or any other stateful component out there.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
class App extends Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {text: ''};
}
onChange(e) {
this.setState({text: e.target.value});
}
render() {
return (
<input onChange={this.onChange.bind(this) value={this.state.value}}
{this.state.text}
);
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
@Component({
selector: 'app',
template: `
<div>
<input (change)="onChange($event)" [value]="state.text" >
{{state.text}}
</div>
`,
})
class App {
state = {text: ''};
onChange(e) {
this.state.text = e.target.value;
}
}
|
This basic approach of handling input changes isn’t too much different between the two frameworks. Both bind to events and then change state based of the input’s value. The main big difference is what event they are binding to. Angular 2 binds allows you to bind to any event emitted from the component such as native or custom events. With Angular 2 we must pass in the $event variable. Like Angular 1.x, the $event variable is created internally. React binds to the onChange event which internally binds to keyup. Angular 2 brings back ngModel which makes two-bindings even easier. We can also refactor our Angular 2 example to take more advantage of local variables in our templates. We can think of local variables as variables that live locally in our render function.
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
|
@Component({
selector: 'app',
template: `
<div>
<input (change)="state.text = $event.target.value" [value]="state.text" >
{{state.text}}
</div>
`,
})
class App {
state = {text: ''};
}
|
Refs
With the release of React 0.14, we can assign refs using a new approach. Let’s compare how to use refs with both frameworks.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
class App extends Component {
changeColor() {
this.box.classList.add('yellow');
}
render() {
return (
<div<
<button
onClick={this.changeColor.bind(this)}
ref={node => this.box = node}>
change
</button>
<div className="box"></div>
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
@Component({
selector: 'app',
template: `
<div>
<button (click)="changeColor(box)">change</button>
<div class="box" #box></div>
</div>
`,
})
class App {
changeColor(box) {
box.classList.add('yellow')
}
}
|
With React, we get access to the raw DOM node and assign it to a property on the component itself. With angular 2, we use the # followed by a variable name on the element we want to reference. This reference is local to the template so we must pass it in as an argument to get access to it. We can reason about why the Angular Team choose #. Including an id to an element gives us access to that element globally in our browser. We can get a reference to our div with window.myElement (if you didn’t know about this then you should try it out). Like React, the ref is also a raw DOM node.
Component composition
Both frameworks take the component approach to building web apps so being able to compose components to create more components is essential. Let’s take a look.
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
class Sidebar extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div className="sidebar">
<h1>Side bar</h1>
</div>
);
}
}
class App extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
<Sidebar />
</div>
);
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
|
@Component({
selector: 'sidebar',
template: `
<div class="sidebar">
<h1>Side bar</h1>
</div>
`
})
class Sidebar {}
@Component({
selector: 'app',
directives: [
Sidebar // we must declare which components/directives are in our template since we don't have jsx do it for us
],
template: `
<div>
<sidebar></sidebar>
</div>
`,
})
class App {}
|
With Angular 2 we make another component using the @Component decorator just like with App. Defining a template the same way also. We then must add the new component to a list of directives to the container component that will use the new component in its template. This is because unlike JSX which just compiles down to function calls, Angular 2 templates need to be told what which components are used in their templates because we’re just using strings to write the templates. This comes in handy when testing as well since we can mock other components. Also, we can self close tags in react like <Sidebar />. We can’t do this yet in Angular 2 but soon.
Props
The concept of stateless components keeps things flexible and predictable. By passing down state from top-level components to child components we only need to worry about inputs of a stateless component through props on the components.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
|
class Sidebar extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div className="sidebar">
<h1>{this.props.title}</h1>
</div>
);
}
}
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(){
super();
this.state = {title: 'Sidebar'};
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Sidebar title={this.state.title} />
</div>
);
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
|
import { Component, Input } from 'angular2/core';
@Component({
selector: 'sidebar',
template: `
<div class="sidebar">
<h1>{{ title }}</h1>
</div>
`
})
class Sidebar {
@Input() title:string;
}
@Component({
selector: 'app',
directives: [
Sidebar
],
template: `
<div>
<sidebar [title]="state.title"></sidebar>
</div>
`,
})
class App {
state = {
title: 'Side bar'
}
}
|
First thing to note here is that we must import the @Input() decorator. Unlike @Component() that is decorating our class, @Input() is will be decorating a property of our class so its positioning inside the class next to or above the property is important. We’re also using typescript typing here to declare a property named title of the string type. We can now refer to this property in the template as {{ title }}. In the container component, we can pass in state using the bracket syntax on the component we want to pass state into, [title]="state.title".
Think of this as accessing properties on a JavaScript object using bracket notation. Where the object in this case is the actual component in the template instead.
|
1
2
3
4
|
var sidebar = new Sidebar();
sidebar[title] = state.title;
|
Dynamic elements
With JSX, we can use JS in your templates to iterate over collections and output valid JSX for rendering. Angular 2 takes an approach closer to angular 1.x to handle this.
> It’s worth noting that Angular 2 does support JSX but is looking for someone in the community to work with them on it.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
|
class Sidebar extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div className="sidebar">
<h1>{this.props.title}</h1>
<ul>
{this.props.items.map(item => <li>{item}</li>})}
</ul>
</div>
);
}
}
class App extends Component {
constructor(){
super();
this.state = {
title: 'Sidebar',
navItems: ['home', 'profile', 'settings']
};
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Sidebar
title={this.state.title}
items={this.state.navItems}
/>
</div>
);
}
}
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
@Component({
selector: 'sidebar',
template: `
<div class="sidebar">
<h1>{{ title }}</h1>
<ul>
<li *ngFor="#item of items">{{ item }}</li>
</ul>
</div>
`
})
class Sidebar {
@Input() title:string;
@Input() items:string[];
}
@Component({
selector: 'app',
directives: [
Sidebar
],
template: `
<div>
<sidebar
[title]="state.title"
[items]="state.items"
></sidebar>
</div>
`,
})
class App {
state = {
title: 'Side bar',
items: ['home', 'profile', 'settings']
}
}
|
Like angular 1.x, angular 2 has a directive we can use to repeat over data and create elements. The ngFor directive is similar to its older sister, ng-repeat. Because angular 2 uses <template> to clone element for performance reasons they, they created a shorthand to expand micro-syntax with *. That’s why we use *ngFor. Just like when using refs, we use the # followed by a variable name to create a local variable in the template. Like ES2015 iterators, we are using a for of loop to iterate over the collection, assigning the current element to the local variable we created.
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
|
<div class="sidebar">
<h1>{{title}}</h1>
<ul>
<template ngFor #item [ngForOf]="items">
<li>{{ item }}</li>
</template>
</ul>
</div>
|
Styles
There are so many ways to add styles to our components. With build tools like webpack, that lists grows longer and longer. Having css encapsulation is an important part of creating flexible components. React doest offer a built in solution so the community stepped up with CSS Modules. These styles are scoped the component using unique classnames to avoid collision. Angular has the same feature baked in.
React
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
|
import CSSModules from 'react-css-modules';
import styles from './styles.css'; // string
import React, {Component} from 'react';
class App extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div styleName='app'> {/* creates app__2gft5 */}
<div styleName='actions'> {/* creates app__actions__74tr */}
<button styleName='button'>click</button>
</div>
</div>
);
}
}
const Root = CSSModules(App, style);
render(<Root/>, document.findElementById('app));
|
Angular 2
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
|
@Component({
selector: 'app',
styles: [`
.app {
}
.app.actions {
}
.app.actions.button {
}
`],
template: `
<div class="app">
<div class="actions">
<button class="button">click</button>
</div>
</div>
`,
})
class App {}
bootstrap(App);
|
Using the styles array on the Component decorator, we can attach styles to the target component. Like with CSSModules, the class names are name spaced to avoid collision. Because the styles are just a string, we can do things like interpolation to make the styles dynamic.
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
|
const APP_CLASS = 'app';
@Component({
selector: 'app',
styles: [`
.${APP_CLASS} {
}
.${APP_CLASS}.actions {
}
.${APP_CLASS}.actions.button {
}
`],
template: `
<div class="${APP_CLASS}">
<div class="actions">
<button class="button">click</button>
</div>
</div>
`,
})
class App {}
bootstrap(App);
|
Who uses regular css these days, with the the help of build tools like webpack, we can use preprocessors as well.
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
import styles from './style.less';
@Component({
selector: 'app',
styles: [styles],
template: `
<div class="app">
<div class="actions">
<button class="button">click</button>
</div>
</div>
`,
})
class App {}
|
If you don’t like the computed dynamic class names that angular creates for your component’s elements, then you have the option to change that.
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
import { Component, Input, ViewEncapsulation} from 'angular2/core';
import styles from './style.less';
@Component({
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.Native,
selector: 'app',
styles: [styles],
template: `
<div class="app">
<div class="actions">
<button class="button">click</button>
</div>
</div>
`,
})
class App {}
|
The encapsulation property on the Component decorator allows us to change how our styles scoping behaves. First we need to import ViewEncapsulation. There are three values that we could use. The default is ViewEncapsulation.Emulated which outputs the funky namespaces class names. ViewEncapsulations.Native uses the shadow DOM. ViewEncapsulation.None scoping of the targets components styles.
Angular 2’s public API is pretty solid and won’t undergo any major changes soon. With the current syntax, the approach to building web apps is not much different than what React does right now. They both accomplish the same thing. Angular 2 provides so much more as well. We didn’t get to talk about life cycle events, actions, and advanced state management and how it relates to React. Stay tuned for that. In the mean time, check out our Angular 2 webapack starter on github for the fastest and best way to get started with angular 2 now.
原文地址:https://angularclass.com/angular-2-for-react-developers/
ANGULAR 2 FOR REACT DEVELOPERS的更多相关文章
- angular开发者吐槽react+redux的复杂:“一个demo证明你的开发效率低下”
曾经看到一篇文章,写的是jquery开发者吐槽angular的复杂.作为一个angular开发者,我来吐槽一下react+redux的复杂. 例子 为了让大家看得舒服,我用最简单的一个demo来展示r ...
- [译] Angular 2 VS. React: 血色将至
Angular 2 VS. React: 血色将至 原文链接:https://medium.com/@housecor/angular-2-versus-react-there-will-be-blo ...
- 如何选择前端框架:ANGULAR VS EMBER VS REACT
最近一段时间是令前端工程师们非常兴奋的时期,因为三大Web框架陆续发布新版本,让我们见识到了更强大的Web框架.Ember2.0在2个月之前已经发布,从1.0升级到2.0非常简单.几周之前React发 ...
- React vs Angular 2: 冰与火之歌
黄玄 · 3 个月前 本文译自 Angular 2 versus React: There Will Be Blood ,其实之前有人翻译过,但是翻得水平有一点不忍直视,我们不希望浪费这篇好文章. 本 ...
- Angular React 和 Vue的比较
Angular(1&2),React,Vue对比 一 数据流 数据绑定 Angular 使用双向绑定即:界面的操作能实时反映到数据,数据的变更能实时展现到界面. 实现原理: $scope变量中 ...
- vue入门 vue与react和Angular的关系和区别
一.为什么学习vue.js vue.js兼具angular.js和react的优点,并且剔除了他们的缺点 官网:http://cn.vuejs.org/ 手册:http://cn.vuejs.org/ ...
- 我从Angular 2转向Vue.js, 也没有选择React
译者按: 通过使用Angular的经历,作者已经完全转为Vue粉了!我们Fundebug目前还是用AngularJS 1,坦白说,学习曲线蛮陡的. 原文: Why we moved from Angu ...
- Angular、React.js 和Node.js到底选谁?
为了工作,程序员选择正确的框架和库来构建应用程序是至关重要的,这也就是为什么Angular和React之间有着太多的争议.Node.js的出现,让这场战争变得更加复杂,虽然有选择权通常是一件很棒的事情 ...
- 【转】前端框架天下三分:Angular React 和 Vue的比较
前端框架天下三分:Angular React 和 Vue的比较 原文链接:http://blog.csdn.net/haoshidai/article/details/52346865 前端这几年的技 ...
随机推荐
- Linux忘记mysql的root密码的解决办法
1.首先确认服务器出于安全的状态,也就是没有人能够任意地连接MySQL数据库. 因为在重新设置MySQL的root密码的期间,MySQL数据库完全出于没有密码保护的 状态下,其他的用户也可以任意地登录 ...
- jmap命令
一.jmap -heap PID using parallel threads in the new generation. ##新生代采用的是并行线程处理方式 using thread-local ...
- bootstrap兼容IE
这种响应式的布局正是通过CSS3的媒体查询(Media Query)功能实现的,根据不同的分辨率来匹配不同的样式.IE8浏览器并不支持这一优秀的Css3特性,Bootstrap在开发文档中写了如何使用 ...
- Office365 InfoPath 表单的设计和应用(原创)
表单的应用:我想到的有2种. 1 做为自定义表单库的模版. 通过发放url(模版链接)给用户来填写表单. 最后将在表单库中得到所有填写的信息列表. 如 2 上传表单做为ContentType 也就是自 ...
- JAXB - Annotations, Type Adapters: XmlJavaTypeAdapter
For some Java container types JAXB has no built-in mapping to an XML structure. Also, you may want t ...
- h2database源码浅析:TransactionMap、MVMap、MVStore
TransactionStore:A store that supports concurrent MVCC read-committed transactions. TransactionStore ...
- RabbitMQ 原文译1.1--HelloWord
本系列文章均来自官网原文,属于个人翻译,如有雷同,权当个人归档,忽喷. RabitMQ 是一个消息中间件,其实就是从消息生产者那里接受消息,然后发送给消息消费者.在这个传输过程中,可以定义一些缓存,持 ...
- Android Activity常用生命周期函数
在Activity中主要有7个常用的周期函数,他们分别是: (一)onCreate 在Activity对象被第一次创建时调用 注: 从另一个Activity返回到前一个Activity时,不会调用该函 ...
- dagger和butterknife使用冲突
两者会冲突的主要原因是因为两者都有:javax.annotation.processing.Processor 于是在build.gradle中添加如下配置即可: // 注释冲突 packagingO ...
- 反汇编windows htonl()函数
因为自己在系统内核写网络程序有时候需要调用htons htonl 这样的函数进行转换,但由于内核只能调用c运行库,别的API不能调用.自己也接触过一点汇编,从来没有去学过.看过老码识途这本书前几章,如 ...