记录一则enq: TX - row lock contention的分析过程
故障描述:与客户沟通,初步确认故障范围大概是在上午的8:30-10:30之间,反应故障现象是Tomcat的连接数满导致应用无法连接,数据库alert中无明显报错,需要协助排查原因。
1.导入包含故障时刻的数据
为了便于后续分析,我向客户索要了从昨天下午13:00到今天18:00的awrdump,导入到自己的实验环境进行分析。
生产环境导出awrdump:
@?/rdbms/admin/awrextr
测试环境导入awrdump:
SYS@jyzhao1 >select * from dba_directories;
SYS@jyzhao1 >create directory jy as '/home/oracle/awrdump';
SYS@jyzhao1 >select * from dba_directories;
SYS@jyzhao1 >!mkdir -p /home/oracle/awrdump
SYS@jyzhao1 >@?/rdbms/admin/awrload
省略部分输出..
... Dropping AWR_STAGE user
End of AWR Load
2.创建m_ash表,明确故障时刻
创建m_ash表:
--create table
create table m_ash20180322 as select * from dba_hist_active_sess_history where dbid=&dbid;
输入生产库对应的dbid,完成创建分析表。
select to_char(sample_time, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi'), count(1)
FROM m_ash20180322
group by to_char(sample_time, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi')
order by 1;
根据生成的数据生成折线图如下:
可以从图中明确故障时刻,即在10:00、12:30、14:10这三个时刻会话都明显上升(积压),看来客户的反馈时间点并没有包含所有异常时刻。
另外,引用下maclean的诊断脚本,可以看到核心意思差不多,只是进一步将instance_number区分开细化:
--验证导出的ASH时间范围:
select
t.dbid, t.instance_number, min(sample_time), max(sample_time), count(*) session_count
from m_ash20180322 t
group by t.dbid, t.instance_number
order by dbid, instance_number;
--确认问题发生的精确时间范围:
select
dbid, instance_number, sample_id, sample_time, count(*) session_count
from m_ash20180322 t
group by dbid, instance_number, sample_id, sample_time
order by dbid, instance_number, sample_time;
3.确定异常时刻的top n event
确定每个采样点的top n event,下面也是参考maclean的脚本。
比如我这里以2018-03-22 09:59:00 - 2018-03-22 10:00:00为例:
select t.dbid,
t.sample_id,
t.sample_time,
t.instance_number,
t.event,
t.session_state,
t.c session_count
from (select t.*,
rank() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time order by c desc) r
from (select /*+ parallel 8 */
t.*,
count(*) over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, event) c,
row_number() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, event order by 1) r1
from dba_hist_active_sess_history t
where sample_time >
to_timestamp('2018-03-22 09:59:00',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and sample_time <
to_timestamp('2018-03-22 10:00:00',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
) t
where r1 = 1) t
where r < 3
order by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, r;
其他异常时刻,输入对应的变量值:
select t.dbid,
t.sample_id,
t.sample_time,
t.instance_number,
t.event,
t.session_state,
t.c session_count
from (select t.*,
rank() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time order by c desc) r
from (select /*+ parallel 8 */
t.*,
count(*) over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, event) c,
row_number() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, event order by 1) r1
from dba_hist_active_sess_history t
where sample_time >
to_timestamp('&begin_sample_time',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and sample_time <
to_timestamp('&end_sample_time',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
) t
where r1 = 1) t
where r < 3
order by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, r;
2018-03-22 12:29:00
2018-03-22 12:30:00
2018-03-22 14:09:00
2018-03-22 14:10:00
综上,3个连接数堆积的异常时刻TOP event都是 “enq: TX - row lock contention”。
4.确定最终的top holder
使用maclean的脚本,观察每个采样点的等待链:
select
level lv,
connect_by_isleaf isleaf,
connect_by_iscycle iscycle,
t.dbid,
t.sample_id,
t.sample_time,
t.instance_number,
t.session_id,
t.sql_id,
t.session_type,
t.event,
t.session_state,
t.blocking_inst_id,
t.blocking_session,
t.blocking_session_status
from m_ash20180322 t
where sample_time >
to_timestamp('2018-03-22 09:59:00',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and sample_time <
to_timestamp('2018-03-22 10:00:00',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
start with blocking_session is not null
connect by nocycle
prior dbid = dbid
and prior sample_time = sample_time
/*and ((prior sample_time) - sample_time between interval '-1'
second and interval '1' second)*/
and prior blocking_inst_id = instance_number
and prior blocking_session = session_id
and prior blocking_session_serial# = session_serial#
order siblings by dbid, sample_time;
结果如下:
进一步筛选,将isleaf=1的叶(top holder)找出来:
--基于上一步的原理来找出每个采样点的最终top holder:
select t.lv,
t.iscycle,
t.dbid,
t.sample_id,
t.sample_time,
t.instance_number,
t.session_id,
t.sql_id,
t.session_type,
t.event,
t.seq#,
t.session_state,
t.blocking_inst_id,
t.blocking_session,
t.blocking_session_status,
t.c blocking_session_count
from (select t.*,
row_number() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time order by c desc) r
from (select t.*,
count(*) over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, session_id) c,
row_number() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, session_id order by 1) r1
from (select /*+ parallel 8 */
level lv,
connect_by_isleaf isleaf,
connect_by_iscycle iscycle,
t.*
from m_ash20180322 t
where sample_time >
to_timestamp('2018-03-22 09:59:00',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and sample_time <
to_timestamp('2018-03-22 10:00:00',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
start with blocking_session is not null
connect by nocycle
prior dbid = dbid
and prior sample_time = sample_time
/*and ((prior sample_time) - sample_time between interval '-1'
second and interval '1' second)*/
and prior blocking_inst_id = instance_number
and prior blocking_session = session_id
and prior
blocking_session_serial# = session_serial#) t
where t.isleaf = 1) t
where r1 = 1) t
where r < 3
order by dbid, sample_time, r;
对其他异常时段进行分析:
2018-03-22 12:29:00
2018-03-22 12:30:00
2018-03-22 14:09:00
2018-03-22 14:10:00
-- top holder: DIY sample_time
select t.lv,
t.iscycle,
t.dbid,
t.sample_id,
t.sample_time,
t.instance_number,
t.session_id,
t.sql_id,
t.session_type,
t.event,
t.seq#,
t.session_state,
t.blocking_inst_id,
t.blocking_session,
t.blocking_session_status,
t.c blocking_session_count
from (select t.*,
row_number() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time order by c desc) r
from (select t.*,
count(*) over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, session_id) c,
row_number() over(partition by dbid, instance_number, sample_time, session_id order by 1) r1
from (select /*+ parallel 8 */
level lv,
connect_by_isleaf isleaf,
connect_by_iscycle iscycle,
t.*
from m_ash20180322 t
where sample_time >
to_timestamp('&begin_sample_time',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
and sample_time <
to_timestamp('&end_sample_time',
'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
start with blocking_session is not null
connect by nocycle
prior dbid = dbid
and prior sample_time = sample_time
/*and ((prior sample_time) - sample_time between interval '-1'
second and interval '1' second)*/
and prior blocking_inst_id = instance_number
and prior blocking_session = session_id
and prior
blocking_session_serial# = session_serial#) t
where t.isleaf = 1) t
where r1 = 1) t
where r < 3
order by dbid, sample_time, r;
发现所有的异常时刻最终阻塞都是实例1的sid为3548的session,不再赘述。
5.总结
从第四步可以看到,top holder都是实例1,会话3548.
比如可以看到实例1的481会话被实例2的6377会话阻塞,然后实例2的6377会话又被实例1的3548会话阻塞。
通过sql_id可以查询到sql文本:
select * from dba_hist_sqltext where sql_id = '&sql_id';
可以看到实例1的3548会话当前正在执行的SQL只是一个查询语句,当前会话状态是ON CPU,所以推测该会话之前有DML的事物未提交导致阻塞。
去查询该会话的DML操作时,也有update和insert操作,但是update操作已经无法找到对应SQL文本。
select t.event, t.*
from m_ash20180322 t
where instance_number = 1
and session_id = 3548
and t.sql_opname <> 'SELECT';
其实从ash也可以看到关于3548阻塞的信息,甚至从addm的建议中也会有类似建议:
Rationale
The session with ID 3548 and serial number 8795 in instance number 1 was
the blocking session responsible for 52% of this recommendation's
benefit.
Rationale
The session with ID 6377 and serial number 30023 in instance number 2
was the blocking session responsible for 47% of this recommendation's
benefit.
只不过我们从底层查询,可以看到6377实际也是被3548阻塞,找到最终阻塞者。
btw,从导入的awrdump中,除了可以取awr外,同样可以支持取awrsqrpi和addmrpti以及ashrpti,非常方便:
SYS@jyzhao1 >@?/rdbms/admin/awrrpti
SYS@jyzhao1 >@?/rdbms/admin/awrsqrpi
SYS@jyzhao1 >@?/rdbms/admin/ashrpti
SYS@jyzhao1 >@?/rdbms/admin/addmrpti
6.reference
- http://feed.askmaclean.com/archives/dba_hist_active_sess_history.html
记录一则enq: TX - row lock contention的分析过程的更多相关文章
- 解决一则enq: TX – row lock contention的性能故障
上周二早上,收到项目组的一封邮件: 早上联代以下时间点用户有反馈EDI导入"假死",我们跟踪了EDI导入服务,服务是正常在跑,可能是处理的慢所以用户感觉是"假死" ...
- ORACLE等待事件:enq: TX - row lock contention
enq: TX - row lock contention等待事件,这个是数据库里面一个比较常见的等待事件.enq是enqueue的缩写,它是一种保护共享资源的锁定机制,一个排队机制,先进先出(FIF ...
- Tuning “enq:TX – row lock contention” events
enq是一种保护共享资源的锁定机制,一个排队机制 排它机制从一个事务的第一次改变直到rollback or commit 结束这个事务, TX等待mode是6,当一个session 在一个表的行级锁定 ...
- AWR之-enq TX - row lock contention的性能故障-转
1 对这一个小时进行AWR的收集和分析,首先,从报告头中看到DB Time达到近500分钟,(DB Time)/Elapsed=8,这个比值偏高: Snap Id Snap Time Sessio ...
- enq: TX - row lock contention故障处理一则
一个非常easy的问题,之所以让我对这个问题进行总结.一是由于没我想象的简单,在处理的过程中遇到了一些磕磕碰碰,甚至绕了一些弯路.二是引发了我对故障处理时的一些思考. 6月19日,下午5点左右.数据库 ...
- 记一则update 发生enq: TX - row lock contention 的处理方法
根据事后在虚拟机中复现客户现场发生的情况,做一次记录(简化部分过程,原理不变) 客户端1执行update语句 SQL> select * from test; ID NAME --------- ...
- ORACLE AWR结合ASH诊断分析enq: TX - row lock contention
公司用户反馈一系统在14:00~15:00(2016-08-16)这个时间段反应比较慢,于是生成了这个时间段的AWR报告, 如上所示,通过Elapsed Time和DB Time对比分析,可以看出在这 ...
- 大表建立索引引发enq: TX - row lock contention等待
今天要给一张日志表(6000w数据)建立索引,导致生产系统行锁部分功能卡住 create index idx_tb_cid on tb_login_log(user_id); 开始执行后大概花费了20 ...
- enq: TX - row lock contention 参数P1,P2,P3说明
enq: TX - row lock contention三个参数,例如,下面的等待事件 * P1 = name|mode <<<<<<< ...
随机推荐
- 记录 serverSocket socket 输入,输出流,关闭顺序,阻塞,PrintWriter的一些问题.
关于socket.getOutputStream() 的一些问题, OutputStream的flush是一个空方法,所以需要另一个实现了Flush的流来包装一下 这里为什么使用PrintWriter ...
- php的filesystem基本函数的学习(1)
1.basename basename — 返回路径中的文件名部分 string basename ( string $path [, string $suffix ] ) 给出一个包含有指向一个文件 ...
- JMeter使用(Linux)
JMeter是一个Java桌面应用程序,用户界面采用Swing Java Api实现,支持并发和多线程或者线程组的执行,对于配置负载测试和压力测试非常有用.Jmeter是开源.免安装的,只需要有jdk ...
- XAF_GS_02_创建第一个XAF项目
上一节我们讲解了如何安装XAF环境,这次我们要开始创建一个自己的XAF项目. Setp 1 第一步打开你的Visual Studio,新建项目,如下图所示,选择DevExpress XAF,选择好你的 ...
- mongodb副本集搭建过程中的问题和解决技巧
在我以往的认知中,一个系统一旦正式上线,多半不会轻易的迁移服务器,尤其是那种涉及到多个关联应用,涉及到多台硬件服务器的系统,因为这种迁移将是牵一发而动全身的. 但是,却仍然有这种情况存在,就如我这几天 ...
- Linux下搭建SVN服务器遇到的问题及解决方法,
1.checkout时,提示:URL svn://192.168.1.99/svntest doesn't exist... 奇怪,怎么会提示库不存在呢?肯定是哪里配置问题.后来尝试了半天,也在网上搜 ...
- dojo拼接成CSV格式字符串
var student = "学号,姓名,年龄\n"; for(var i = 0;i<resp.items.length;i++) { student += resp.it ...
- Error Code: 1175. You are using safe update mode and you tried to update a table without a WHERE
1 错误描述 19:15:34 call sp_store_insert(90) Error Code: 1175. You are using safe update mode and you tr ...
- Procedure execution failed 2013 - Lost connection to MySQL server during query
1 错误描述 Procedure execution failed 2013 - Lost connection to MySQL server during query 2 错误原因 由错误描述可知 ...
- 基于am3358的蜂鸣器测试
#include <sys/ioctl.h> #include<stdio.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <sys/types ...