C# 字符串拼接性能探索
本文通过ANTS Memory Profiler工具探索c#中+、string.Concat、string.Format、StringBuilder.Append四种方式进行字符串拼接时的性能。
本文涉及程序为.NET Core 2.0控制台应用程序。
一、常量字符串拼接
private static void TestPerformance(Action action, int times)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
for(int i = ; i < times; i++)
{
action();
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(action.Method.Name + ", FullTime: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
常量字符串测试方法
1.+方法
1.1连续拼接
private static void AddTest()
{
string s = string.Empty;
s = "" + "" + "" + "" + "" + "" + "" + "";
}
+连续拼接常量字符串
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void AddTest() cil managed
{
// Code size 7 (0x7)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: pop
IL_0006: ret
} // end of method Program::AddTest
1.2分段拼接
private static void AddWithParamTest2()
{
string s = string.Empty;
s += "";
s += "";
s += "";
s += "";
s += "";
s += "";
s += "";
s += "";
}
分段拼接常量字符串
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void AddWithParamTest2() cil managed
{
// Code size 87 (0x57)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: ldstr ""
IL_000a: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_000f: ldstr ""
IL_0014: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0019: ldstr ""
IL_001e: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0023: ldstr ""
IL_0028: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_002d: ldstr ""
IL_0032: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0037: ldstr ""
IL_003c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0041: ldstr ""
IL_0046: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_004b: ldstr ""
IL_0050: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0055: pop
IL_0056: ret
} // end of method Program::AddWithParamTest2
通过IL代码可以看出，分段的+=代码调用的是Concat方法，并且比连续的+多开辟了许多内存空间。
2.Concat方法
2.1分次Concat
private static void ConcatTest()
{
string s = string.Empty;
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
s = string.Concat(s, "");
}
分次Concat常量字符串
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void AddWithParamTest2() cil managed
{
// Code size 87 (0x57)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: ldstr ""
IL_000a: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_000f: ldstr ""
IL_0014: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0019: ldstr ""
IL_001e: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0023: ldstr ""
IL_0028: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_002d: ldstr ""
IL_0032: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0037: ldstr ""
IL_003c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0041: ldstr ""
IL_0046: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_004b: ldstr ""
IL_0050: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0055: pop
IL_0056: ret
} // end of method Program::AddWithParamTest2
可见IL代码与+分段拼接常量字符串相同，性能相似。
2.2Concat一次拼接常量字符串
private static void ConcatTest2()
{
string s = string.Empty;
string.Concat(s, "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "");
}
Concat一次拼接常量字符串
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void ConcatTest2() cil managed
{
// Code size 88 (0x58)
.maxstack
.locals init (string V_0)
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldc.i4.s
IL_0008: newarr [System.Runtime]System.String
IL_000d: dup
IL_000e: ldc.i4.
IL_000f: ldloc.
IL_0010: stelem.ref
IL_0011: dup
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: ldstr ""
IL_0018: stelem.ref
IL_0019: dup
IL_001a: ldc.i4.
IL_001b: ldstr ""
IL_0020: stelem.ref
IL_0021: dup
IL_0022: ldc.i4.
IL_0023: ldstr ""
IL_0028: stelem.ref
IL_0029: dup
IL_002a: ldc.i4.
IL_002b: ldstr ""
IL_0030: stelem.ref
IL_0031: dup
IL_0032: ldc.i4.
IL_0033: ldstr ""
IL_0038: stelem.ref
IL_0039: dup
IL_003a: ldc.i4.
IL_003b: ldstr ""
IL_0040: stelem.ref
IL_0041: dup
IL_0042: ldc.i4.
IL_0043: ldstr ""
IL_0048: stelem.ref
IL_0049: dup
IL_004a: ldc.i4.
IL_004b: ldstr ""
IL_0050: stelem.ref
IL_0051: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string[])
IL_0056: stloc.0
IL_0057: ret
} // end of method Program::ConcatTest2
通过IL代码可以看出，string.Concat(s, s1, s2, s3)并不调用String.Concat方法，而是直接在堆栈上进行操作。因为需要局部变量来标记，比分次调用Concat方法所占的内存要多一些。
3.Format方法
3.1一次Format
private static void FormatTest()
{
string s = string.Empty;
s = string.Format("{0}{1}{2}{3}{4}{5}{6}{7}", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "");
}
Format常量字符串拼接
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void FormatTest() cil managed
{
// Code size 88 (0x58)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: pop
IL_0006: ldstr "{0}{1}{2}{3}{4}{5}{6}{7}"
IL_000b: ldc.i4.
IL_000c: newarr [System.Runtime]System.Object
IL_0011: dup
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: ldstr ""
IL_0018: stelem.ref
IL_0019: dup
IL_001a: ldc.i4.
IL_001b: ldstr ""
IL_0020: stelem.ref
IL_0021: dup
IL_0022: ldc.i4.
IL_0023: ldstr ""
IL_0028: stelem.ref
IL_0029: dup
IL_002a: ldc.i4.
IL_002b: ldstr ""
IL_0030: stelem.ref
IL_0031: dup
IL_0032: ldc.i4.
IL_0033: ldstr ""
IL_0038: stelem.ref
IL_0039: dup
IL_003a: ldc.i4.
IL_003b: ldstr ""
IL_0040: stelem.ref
IL_0041: dup
IL_0042: ldc.i4.
IL_0043: ldstr ""
IL_0048: stelem.ref
IL_0049: dup
IL_004a: ldc.i4.
IL_004b: ldstr ""
IL_0050: stelem.ref
IL_0051: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object[])
IL_0056: pop
IL_0057: ret
} // end of method Program::FormatTest
StringFormat方法虽然是基于StringBuilder，但由于需要遍历字符串来识别占位符，所以比较慢。
3.2Format分次拼接
private static void FormatTest2()
{
string s = string.Empty;
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
s = string.Format("{0}{1}", s, "");
}
Format分次拼接常量字符串
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void FormatTest2() cil managed
{
// Code size 143 (0x8f)
.maxstack
.locals init (string V_0)
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_000b: ldloc.
IL_000c: ldstr ""
IL_0011: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_0016: stloc.
IL_0017: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_001c: ldloc.
IL_001d: ldstr ""
IL_0022: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_0027: stloc.
IL_0028: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_002d: ldloc.
IL_002e: ldstr ""
IL_0033: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_0038: stloc.
IL_0039: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_003e: ldloc.
IL_003f: ldstr ""
IL_0044: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_0049: stloc.
IL_004a: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_004f: ldloc.
IL_0050: ldstr ""
IL_0055: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_005a: stloc.
IL_005b: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_0060: ldloc.
IL_0061: ldstr ""
IL_0066: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_006b: stloc.
IL_006c: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_0071: ldloc.
IL_0072: ldstr ""
IL_0077: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_007c: stloc.
IL_007d: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_0082: ldloc.
IL_0083: ldstr ""
IL_0088: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_008d: stloc.
IL_008e: ret
} // end of method Program::FormatTest2
分次使用Format方法拼接字符串，即分次调用Format方法，多次循环遍历字符串，耗时更长。
4.StringBuilder方法
private static void BuilderTest()
{
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
sb.Append("");
}
Builder拼接常量字符串
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void BuilderTest() cil managed
{
// Code size 101 (0x65)
.maxstack
IL_0000: newobj instance void [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::.ctor()
IL_0005: dup
IL_0006: ldstr ""
IL_000b: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0010: pop
IL_0011: dup
IL_0012: ldstr ""
IL_0017: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_001c: pop
IL_001d: dup
IL_001e: ldstr ""
IL_0023: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0028: pop
IL_0029: dup
IL_002a: ldstr ""
IL_002f: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0034: pop
IL_0035: dup
IL_0036: ldstr ""
IL_003b: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0040: pop
IL_0041: dup
IL_0042: ldstr ""
IL_0047: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_004c: pop
IL_004d: dup
IL_004e: ldstr ""
IL_0053: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0058: pop
IL_0059: ldstr ""
IL_005e: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0063: pop
IL_0064: ret
} // end of method Program::BuilderTest
在短字符串大量拼接的测试中，可以看出一次使用+进行拼接所耗内存最少，所用时间最短。其余方式所耗内存相差不大，但StringBuilder所耗时间明显较短。
由于Format方法内部存在对字符串的遍历，可以推测，随着字符串的长度变长，Format方法所耗时间将会增加。
二、字符串变量拼接（多次循环拼接）
private static void TestPerformanceWithParam<T>(Action<T> action, T t, int times)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
for (int i = ; i < times; i++)
{
action(t);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(action.Method.Name + ", FullTime: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
变量字符串测试方法
1.+方法
1.1连续拼接
private static void AddTest(string t)
{
string s = string.Empty;
s = t + t + t + t + t + t + t + t;
}
Plus字符串变量连续拼接
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void AddTest(string t) cil managed
{
// Code size 51 (0x33)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: pop
IL_0006: ldc.i4.
IL_0007: newarr [System.Runtime]System.String
IL_000c: dup
IL_000d: ldc.i4.
IL_000e: ldarg.
IL_000f: stelem.ref
IL_0010: dup
IL_0011: ldc.i4.
IL_0012: ldarg.
IL_0013: stelem.ref
IL_0014: dup
IL_0015: ldc.i4.
IL_0016: ldarg.
IL_0017: stelem.ref
IL_0018: dup
IL_0019: ldc.i4.
IL_001a: ldarg.
IL_001b: stelem.ref
IL_001c: dup
IL_001d: ldc.i4.
IL_001e: ldarg.
IL_001f: stelem.ref
IL_0020: dup
IL_0021: ldc.i4.
IL_0022: ldarg.
IL_0023: stelem.ref
IL_0024: dup
IL_0025: ldc.i4.
IL_0026: ldarg.
IL_0027: stelem.ref
IL_0028: dup
IL_0029: ldc.i4.
IL_002a: ldarg.
IL_002b: stelem.ref
IL_002c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string[])
IL_0031: pop
IL_0032: ret
} // end of method Program::AddTest
Plus字符串变量拼接IL
从IL代码可见，在使用+连续拼接字符串变量时，内部调用了String.Concat(string[])方法。
1.2分段拼接
private static void AddWithParamTest2(string t)
{
string s = string.Empty;
s += t;
s += t;
s += t;
s += t;
s += t;
s += t;
s += t;
s += t;
}
Plus字符串变量拼接分段
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void AddWithParamTest2(string t) cil managed
{
// Code size 55 (0x37)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: ldarg.
IL_0006: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_000b: ldarg.
IL_000c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0011: ldarg.
IL_0012: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0017: ldarg.
IL_0018: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_001d: ldarg.
IL_001e: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0023: ldarg.
IL_0024: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0029: ldarg.
IL_002a: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_002f: ldarg.
IL_0030: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0035: pop
IL_0036: ret
} // end of method Program::AddWithParamTest2
2.Concat方法
2.1分次concat
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void ConcatTest(string t) cil managed
{
// Code size 55 (0x37)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: ldarg.
IL_0006: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_000b: ldarg.
IL_000c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0011: ldarg.
IL_0012: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0017: ldarg.
IL_0018: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_001d: ldarg.
IL_001e: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0023: ldarg.
IL_0024: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0029: ldarg.
IL_002a: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_002f: ldarg.
IL_0030: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_0035: pop
IL_0036: ret
} // end of method Program::ConcatTest
从IL代码来看，同使用+分段拼接相似。
2.2一次拼接
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void ConcatTest2(string t) cil managed
{
// Code size 56 (0x38)
.maxstack
.locals init (string V_0)
IL_0000: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldc.i4.s
IL_0008: newarr [System.Runtime]System.String
IL_000d: dup
IL_000e: ldc.i4.
IL_000f: ldloc.
IL_0010: stelem.ref
IL_0011: dup
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: ldarg.
IL_0014: stelem.ref
IL_0015: dup
IL_0016: ldc.i4.
IL_0017: ldarg.
IL_0018: stelem.ref
IL_0019: dup
IL_001a: ldc.i4.
IL_001b: ldarg.
IL_001c: stelem.ref
IL_001d: dup
IL_001e: ldc.i4.
IL_001f: ldarg.
IL_0020: stelem.ref
IL_0021: dup
IL_0022: ldc.i4.
IL_0023: ldarg.
IL_0024: stelem.ref
IL_0025: dup
IL_0026: ldc.i4.
IL_0027: ldarg.
IL_0028: stelem.ref
IL_0029: dup
IL_002a: ldc.i4.
IL_002b: ldarg.
IL_002c: stelem.ref
IL_002d: dup
IL_002e: ldc.i4.
IL_002f: ldarg.
IL_0030: stelem.ref
IL_0031: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string[])
IL_0036: stloc.
IL_0037: ret
} // end of method Program::ConcatTest2
从IL代码可以看出，同使用+一次拼接相似。
3.Format
private static void FormatTest(string t)
{
string s = string.Format("{0}{1}{2}{3}{4}{5}{6}{7}", t, t, t, t, t, t, t, t);
}
Format字符串变量拼接
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void FormatTest(string t) cil managed
{
// Code size 50 (0x32)
.maxstack
IL_0000: ldstr "{0}{1}{2}{3}{4}{5}{6}{7}"
IL_0005: ldc.i4.
IL_0006: newarr [System.Runtime]System.Object
IL_000b: dup
IL_000c: ldc.i4.
IL_000d: ldarg.
IL_000e: stelem.ref
IL_000f: dup
IL_0010: ldc.i4.
IL_0011: ldarg.
IL_0012: stelem.ref
IL_0013: dup
IL_0014: ldc.i4.
IL_0015: ldarg.
IL_0016: stelem.ref
IL_0017: dup
IL_0018: ldc.i4.
IL_0019: ldarg.
IL_001a: stelem.ref
IL_001b: dup
IL_001c: ldc.i4.
IL_001d: ldarg.
IL_001e: stelem.ref
IL_001f: dup
IL_0020: ldc.i4.
IL_0021: ldarg.
IL_0022: stelem.ref
IL_0023: dup
IL_0024: ldc.i4.
IL_0025: ldarg.
IL_0026: stelem.ref
IL_0027: dup
IL_0028: ldc.i4.
IL_0029: ldarg.
IL_002a: stelem.ref
IL_002b: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object[])
IL_0030: pop
IL_0031: ret
} // end of method Program::FormatTest
时间的损耗主要来自于String.Format方法。
4.StringBuilder方法
private static void BuilderTest(string t)
{
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
sb.Append(t);
}
Builder字符串变量拼接
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void BuilderTest(string t) cil managed
{
// Code size 69 (0x45)
.maxstack
IL_0000: newobj instance void [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::.ctor()
IL_0005: dup
IL_0006: ldarg.
IL_0007: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_000c: pop
IL_000d: dup
IL_000e: ldarg.
IL_000f: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0014: pop
IL_0015: dup
IL_0016: ldarg.
IL_0017: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_001c: pop
IL_001d: dup
IL_001e: ldarg.
IL_001f: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0024: pop
IL_0025: dup
IL_0026: ldarg.
IL_0027: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_002c: pop
IL_002d: dup
IL_002e: ldarg.
IL_002f: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0034: pop
IL_0035: dup
IL_0036: ldarg.
IL_0037: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_003c: pop
IL_003d: ldarg.
IL_003e: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_0043: pop
IL_0044: ret
} // end of method Program::BuilderTest
在短字符串（上面所用字符串为“short”）大量循环拼接（上述结果为每个方法循环执行一千万次）时，四种方法的差距并不明显。
当字符串变长后，可见运行结果差距拉大：
此时StringBuilder仍没有明显的优势。
三、字符串变量拼接（循环拼接至一个字符串）
1.+方法
private static void TestAddVeryLong(string s, int times)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
string str = string.Empty;
for(int i = ; i < times; i++)
{
str += s;
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("add very long: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
Plus长字符串拼接
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void TestAddVeryLong(string s,
int32 times) cil managed
{
// Code size 71 (0x47)
.maxstack
.locals init (class [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch V_0,
string V_1,
int32 V_2)
IL_0000: newobj instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::.ctor()
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldloc.
IL_0007: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Start()
IL_000c: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0011: stloc.
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: stloc.
IL_0014: br.s IL_0022
IL_0016: ldloc.
IL_0017: ldarg.
IL_0018: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_001d: stloc.
IL_001e: ldloc.
IL_001f: ldc.i4.
IL_0020: add
IL_0021: stloc.
IL_0022: ldloc.
IL_0023: ldarg.
IL_0024: blt.s IL_0016
IL_0026: ldloc.
IL_0027: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Stop()
IL_002c: ldstr "add very long: "
IL_0031: ldloc.
IL_0032: callvirt instance int64 [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::get_ElapsedMilliseconds()
IL_0037: box [System.Runtime]System.Int64
IL_003c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(object,
object)
IL_0041: call void [System.Console]System.Console::WriteLine(string)
IL_0046: ret
} // end of method Program::TestAddVeryLong
2.Concat方法
private static void TestConcatVeryLong(string s, int times)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
string str = string.Empty;
for (int i = ; i < times; i++)
{
str = string.Concat(str, s);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("concat very long: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
Concat长字符串拼接
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void TestConcatVeryLong(string s,
int32 times) cil managed
{
// Code size 71 (0x47)
.maxstack
.locals init (class [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch V_0,
string V_1,
int32 V_2)
IL_0000: newobj instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::.ctor()
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldloc.
IL_0007: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Start()
IL_000c: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0011: stloc.
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: stloc.
IL_0014: br.s IL_0022
IL_0016: ldloc.
IL_0017: ldarg.
IL_0018: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(string,
string)
IL_001d: stloc.
IL_001e: ldloc.
IL_001f: ldc.i4.
IL_0020: add
IL_0021: stloc.
IL_0022: ldloc.
IL_0023: ldarg.
IL_0024: blt.s IL_0016
IL_0026: ldloc.
IL_0027: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Stop()
IL_002c: ldstr "concat very long: "
IL_0031: ldloc.
IL_0032: callvirt instance int64 [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::get_ElapsedMilliseconds()
IL_0037: box [System.Runtime]System.Int64
IL_003c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(object,
object)
IL_0041: call void [System.Console]System.Console::WriteLine(string)
IL_0046: ret
} // end of method Program::TestConcatVeryLong
由IL代码可见，和使用+性能相似。
3.Format方法
private static void TestFormatVeryLong(string s, int times)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
string str = string.Empty;
for (int i = ; i < times; i++)
{
str = string.Format("{0}{1}", str, s);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("format very long: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
Format长字符串拼接
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void TestFormatVeryLong(string s,
int32 times) cil managed
{
// Code size 76 (0x4c)
.maxstack
.locals init (class [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch V_0,
string V_1,
int32 V_2)
IL_0000: newobj instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::.ctor()
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldloc.
IL_0007: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Start()
IL_000c: ldsfld string [System.Runtime]System.String::Empty
IL_0011: stloc.
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: stloc.
IL_0014: br.s IL_0027
IL_0016: ldstr "{0}{1}"
IL_001b: ldloc.
IL_001c: ldarg.
IL_001d: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Format(string,
object,
object)
IL_0022: stloc.
IL_0023: ldloc.
IL_0024: ldc.i4.
IL_0025: add
IL_0026: stloc.
IL_0027: ldloc.
IL_0028: ldarg.
IL_0029: blt.s IL_0016
IL_002b: ldloc.
IL_002c: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Stop()
IL_0031: ldstr "format very long: "
IL_0036: ldloc.
IL_0037: callvirt instance int64 [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::get_ElapsedMilliseconds()
IL_003c: box [System.Runtime]System.Int64
IL_0041: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(object,
object)
IL_0046: call void [System.Console]System.Console::WriteLine(string)
IL_004b: ret
} // end of method Program::TestFormatVeryLong
4.StringBuilder方法
private static void TestBuilderVeryLong(string s, int times)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = ; i < times; i++)
{
sb.Append(s);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("builder very long: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
Builder拼接长字符串
运行时间：
内存情况：
IL代码：
.method private hidebysig static void TestBuilderVeryLong(string s,
int32 times) cil managed
{
// Code size 71 (0x47)
.maxstack
.locals init (class [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch V_0,
class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder V_1,
int32 V_2)
IL_0000: newobj instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::.ctor()
IL_0005: stloc.
IL_0006: ldloc.
IL_0007: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Start()
IL_000c: newobj instance void [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::.ctor()
IL_0011: stloc.
IL_0012: ldc.i4.
IL_0013: stloc.
IL_0014: br.s IL_0022
IL_0016: ldloc.
IL_0017: ldarg.
IL_0018: callvirt instance class [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder [System.Runtime]System.Text.StringBuilder::Append(string)
IL_001d: pop
IL_001e: ldloc.
IL_001f: ldc.i4.
IL_0020: add
IL_0021: stloc.
IL_0022: ldloc.
IL_0023: ldarg.
IL_0024: blt.s IL_0016
IL_0026: ldloc.
IL_0027: callvirt instance void [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::Stop()
IL_002c: ldstr "builder very long: "
IL_0031: ldloc.
IL_0032: callvirt instance int64 [System.Runtime.Extensions]System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch::get_ElapsedMilliseconds()
IL_0037: box [System.Runtime]System.Int64
IL_003c: call string [System.Runtime]System.String::Concat(object,
object)
IL_0041: call void [System.Console]System.Console::WriteLine(string)
IL_0046: ret
} // end of method Program::TestBuilderVeryLong
这个差距在拼接字符串更多的时候会更加明显。
拼接一千万次时，+方法运行一个多小时仍无法得出结果：
而StringBuilder只需要102ms。
+方法的问题在于由于string的特殊性，每次操作都将新开辟内存空间，随着字符串长度的增加、操作次数的增加等，+方法所耗费的内存会越来越大。
而StringBuilder则可以在原有的内存空间中进行修改和扩张，在进行频繁、长串的操作时极大地提高了效率。
显然，如果是不频繁、短字符串的拼接，使用哪种方式拼接字符串没有明显的性能差别（Format可能稍差一些），但如果是频繁的长串操作，StringBuilder具有绝对的优势。
C# 字符串拼接性能探索的更多相关文章
- C# 字符串拼接性能探索 c#中+、string.Concat、string.Format、StringBuilder.Append四种方式进行字符串拼接时的性能
本文通过ANTS Memory Profiler工具探索c#中+.string.Concat.string.Format.StringBuilder.Append四种方式进行字符串拼接时的性能. 本文 ...
- golang字符串拼接性能对比
对比 +(运算符).strings.Join.sprintf.bytes.Buffer对字符串拼接的性能 package main import ( "bytes" "f ...
- C# 利用StringBuilder提升字符串拼接性能
一个项目中有数据图表呈现,数据量稍大时显得很慢. 用Stopwatch分段监控了一下,发现耗时最多的函数是SaveToExcel 此函数中遍列所有数据行,通过Replace替换标签生成Excel行,然 ...
- 操作 html 的时候是使用 dom 方法还是字符串拼接？
比如一个列表里面有很多个 li,要给他们加上数据.但多少个 li 是不确定的,由后台数据确定.这时候,就要动态生成 html 内容了. 那么,这个过程, 是使用 += 方法把标签.数据进行一个个的字符 ...
- javascript中字符串拼接详解
字符串拼接是所有程序设计语言都需要的操作.当拼接结果较长时,如何保证效率就成为一个很重要的问题.本文介绍的是Javascript中的字符串拼接,希望对你有帮助,一起来看. 最近在研究<jav ...
- 【转】Java 5种字符串拼接方式性能比较。
最近写一个东东,可能会考虑到字符串拼接,想了几种方法,但对性能未知,于是用Junit写了个单元测试. 代码如下: import java.util.ArrayList; import java.uti ...
- Java 5种字符串拼接方式性能比较。
最近写一个东东,可能会考虑到字符串拼接,想了几种方法,但对性能未知,于是用Junit写了个单元测试. 代码如下: import java.util.ArrayList; import java.uti ...
- Java中测试StringBuilder、StringBuffer、String在字符串拼接上的性能
应一个大量字符串拼接的任务 测试一下StringBuilder.StringBuffer.String在操作字符串拼接时候的性能 性能上理论是StringBuilder > StringBu ...
- java字符串格式化性能对比String.format/StringBuilder/+拼接
String.format由于每次都有生成一个Formatter对象,因此速度会比较慢,在大数据量需要格式化处理的时候,避免使用String.format进行格式化,相反使用StringUtils.l ...
随机推荐
- Javascript学习之：JSON
JSON(JavaScript Object Notation) 是一种轻量级的数据交换格式.它是基于ECMAScript的一个子集,采用完全独立于语言的文本格式.这些特性使JSON成为理想的数据交换 ...
- 2018年2月19日我的java学习
2019/2/18 星期一今天学习了Java 中的面向对象思想主要学习了类 构造器等在学习修饰属性的过程中,有4点必须牢记前提是理解类的各种关系 类中有5种关系 本身 同包类 同包继承子类 不同包继承 ...
- day_1 Python介绍及计算机组成和系统
python学习路线 基础语法 - 文件操作 - 函数 - 模块 - 面向对象(类) - 网络编程 - 数据库 - 前段 - 项目 学习方法 wwwh: what-why-where-how #wha ...
- Apollo配置管理系统使用
- 【论文学习】YOLO9000: Better,Faster,Stronger（YOLO9000：更好，更快，更强）
原文下载:https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.08242v1.pdf 工程代码:http://pjreddie.com/darknet/yolo/ 目录 目录 摘要 简介 BETTE ...
- Internetworking
1 Introduction 所谓的InternetWorking就是将很多网络连接起来,那么在这种连接的网络下我们该如何传送封包呢? 2 IP and Routers 1 IP Datagram H ...
- Apache Drill - join HBase and RDBMs
HBase作为Nosql的常用系统之一,在很多大数据应用/平台中广泛使用.例如通过Spark统计后将结果存放到HBase中.通常统计结果还需要进一步和元数据或者字典表关联从而得到最终结果显示,这意味着 ...
- C# Autofac集成之Framework WebAPI
Web API 2集成需要Autofac.WebApi2 NuGet包. Web API集成需要Autofac.WebApi NuGet包. Web API集成为控制器,模型绑定器和操作过滤器提供了依 ...
- 【BZOJ】 Hash Killer I II III
前言 这里只是一个整理... Solution Hash Killer I Hash Killer II
- Delphi - TDateTimePicker使用注意问题
TDateTimePicker使用时候,如果想获取到修改后的值,必须注Kind和time属性必须对应! 1,时间设置: treatmentTime1DTPicker.Kind := dtkTime; ...