ViewGroup的事件机制
根据View的事件机制,再添加在代码中添加一个自定义的LinearLayout,继承LinearLayout,然后复写了与事件分发机制有关的方法,日志输出
import android.content.Context;
import android.util.AttributeSet;
import android.util.Log;
import android.view.MotionEvent;
import android.widget.LinearLayout;
public class MyLinearLayout extends LinearLayout {
private static final String TAG = "MyLinearLayout"; public MyLinearLayout(Context context) {
super(context);
} public MyLinearLayout(Context context, AttributeSet attrs) {
super(context, attrs);
} public MyLinearLayout(Context context, AttributeSet attrs, int defStyleAttr) {
super(context, attrs, defStyleAttr);
} @Override
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
int action = ev.getAction();
switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
Log.e(TAG, "dispatchTouchEvent ACTION_DOWN");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
Log.e(TAG, "dispatchTouchEvent ACTION_MOVE");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
Log.e(TAG, "dispatchTouchEvent ACTION_UP");
break;
default:
break; }
return super.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
} @Override
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
int action = event.getAction(); switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
Log.e(TAG, "onTouchEvent ACTION_DOWN");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
Log.e(TAG, "onTouchEvent ACTION_MOVE");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
Log.e(TAG, "onTouchEvent ACTION_UP");
break; default:
break;
}
return super.onTouchEvent(event);
} @Override
public boolean onInterceptTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
int action = ev.getAction();
switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
Log.e(TAG, "onInterceptTouchEvent ACTION_DOWN");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
Log.e(TAG, "onInterceptTouchEvent ACTION_MOVE");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
Log.e(TAG, "onInterceptTouchEvent ACTION_UP");
break; default:
break;
}
return super.onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
} @Override
public void requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(boolean disallowIntercept) {
super.requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(disallowIntercept);
Log.e(TAG, "requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent ");
}
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<com.loaderman.eventanalysis.MyLinearLayout
xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:gravity="center"
tools:context="com.jcf.eventanalysis.MainActivity"> <com.loaderman.eventanalysis.MyButton
android:id="@+id/btn"
android:layout_width="200dp"
android:layout_height="100dp"
android:text="MyButton"/>
</com.loaderman.eventanalysis.MyLinearLayout>
MyLinearLayout中包含一个MyButton,MyButton是自定义Button,然后MainActivity就是直接加载布局,直接运行代码,然后点击我们的Button,如果没有MOVE一下,就不会触发MOVE事件,看一下日志的输出:
可以看到大体的事件流程为:
MyLinearLayout的dispatchTouchEvent -> MyLinearLayout的onInterceptTouchEvent -> MyButton的dispatchTouchEvent ->Mybutton的onTouchEvent
可以看出,在View上触发事件,最先捕获到事件的为View所在的ViewGroup,然后才会到View自身~
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:普通表格;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.5pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;}
源码分析
Normal
0
7.8 磅
0
2
false
false
false
EN-US
ZH-CN
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:普通表格;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.5pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;}
ViewGroup - dispatchTouchEvent
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
源码分析
ViewGroup - dispatchTouchEvent
________________________________________ public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(ev, 1);
} // If the event targets the accessibility focused view and this is it, start
// normal event dispatch. Maybe a descendant is what will handle the click.
if (ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus() && isAccessibilityFocusedViewOrHost()) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
} boolean handled = false;
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(ev)) {
final int action = ev.getAction();
final int actionMasked = action & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK; // Handle an initial down.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.
// The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture
// due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
} // Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
} // If intercepted, start normal event dispatch. Also if there is already
// a view that is handling the gesture, do normal event dispatch.
if (intercepted || mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
} // Check for cancelation.
final boolean canceled = resetCancelNextUpFlag(this)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL; // Update list of touch targets for pointer down, if needed.
final boolean split = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_SPLIT_MOTION_EVENTS) != 0;
TouchTarget newTouchTarget = null;
boolean alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = false;
if (!canceled && !intercepted) { // If the event is targeting accessiiblity focus we give it to the
// view that has accessibility focus and if it does not handle it
// we clear the flag and dispatch the event to all children as usual.
// We are looking up the accessibility focused host to avoid keeping
// state since these events are very rare.
View childWithAccessibilityFocus = ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()
? findChildWithAccessibilityFocus() : null; if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down
final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)
: TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS; // Clean up earlier touch targets for this pointer id in case they
// have become out of sync.
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign); final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x = ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y = ev.getY(actionIndex);
// Find a child that can receive the event.
// Scan children from front to back.
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex); // If there is a view that has accessibility focus we want it
// to get the event first and if not handled we will perform a
// normal dispatch. We may do a double iteration but this is
// safer given the timeframe.
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
} if (!canViewReceivePointerEvents(child)
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
} newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
} resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
} // The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
} if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
}
} // Dispatch to touch targets.
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
} // Update list of touch targets for pointer up or cancel, if needed.
if (canceled
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
resetTouchState();
} else if (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_UP) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex();
final int idBitsToRemove = 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex);
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToRemove);
}
} if (!handled && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(ev, 1);
}
return handled;
}
ATION_DOWN的处理流程:
取消TouchTarget,重置TouchState的状态
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
进行判断是否拦截
// Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
两种可能会进入IF代码段
1、当前不允许拦截,即disallowIntercept =true,
2、当前允许拦截但是不拦截,即disallowIntercept =false,但是onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)返回false ;
注:disallowIntercept 可以通过viewGroup.requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(boolean);进行设置,而onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)可以进行复写。
接下来开始遍历所有的子View
进行判断当前的x,y坐标是否落在子View身上,如果在执行child.dispatchTouchEvent(ev),就进入了View的dispatchTouchEvent代码中了,当child.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)返回true,则为mMotionTarget=child;然后return true;
小结:ViewGroup实现捕获到DOWN事件,如果代码中不做TOUCH事件拦截,则开始查找当前x,y是否在某个子View的区域内,如果在,则把事件分发下去。
把ACTION_DOWN时赋值的mMotionTarget,付给target ;
23行:if (!disallowIntercept && onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)) 当前允许拦截且拦截了,才进入IF体,当然了默认是不会拦截的~这里执行了onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)
28-30行:把坐标系统转化为子View的坐标系统
32行:直接return target.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
可以看到,正常流程下,ACTION_MOVE在检测完是否拦截以后,直接调用了子View.dispatchTouchEvent,事件分发下去;
最后就是ACTION_UP了
17行:判断当前是否是ACTION_UP
21,28行:分别重置拦截标志位以及将DOWN赋值的mMotionTarget置为null,都UP了,当然置为null,下一次DOWN还会再赋值的~
最后,修改坐标系统,然后调用target.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
正常情况下,整个代码的流程:
1、ACTION_DOWN中,ViewGroup捕获到事件,然后判断是否拦截,如果没有拦截,则找到包含当前x,y坐标的子View,赋值给mMotionTarget,然后调用 mMotionTarget.dispatchTouchEvent
2、ACTION_MOVE中,ViewGroup捕获到事件,然后判断是否拦截,如果没有拦截,则直接调用mMotionTarget.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)
3、ACTION_UP中,ViewGroup捕获到事件,然后判断是否拦截,如果没有拦截,则直接调用mMotionTarget.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)
当然了在分发之前都会修改下坐标系统,把当前的x,y分别减去child.left 和 child.top ,然后传给child;
关于拦截
如何拦截
上面的总结都是基于:如果没有拦截;那么如何拦截呢?
复写ViewGroup的onInterceptTouchEvent方法:
public boolean onInterceptTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
int action = ev.getAction();
switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
Log.e(TAG, "onInterceptTouchEvent ACTION_DOWN");
//如果你觉得需要拦截,return true
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
Log.e(TAG, "onInterceptTouchEvent ACTION_MOVE");
//如果你觉得需要拦截,return true
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
Log.e(TAG, "onInterceptTouchEvent ACTION_UP");
//如果你觉得需要拦截,return true
break; default:
break;
}
return false;
}
默认是不拦截的,即返回false;如果你需要拦截,只要return true就行了,这要该事件就不会往子View传递了,并且如果你在DOWN retrun true ,则DOWN,MOVE,UP子View都不会捕获事件;如果你在MOVE return true , 则子View在MOVE和UP都不会捕获事件。
原因很简单,当onInterceptTouchEvent(ev) return true的时候,会把mMotionTarget 置为null ;
如何不被拦截
如果ViewGroup的onInterceptTouchEvent(ev) 当ACTION_MOVE时return true ,即拦截了子View的MOVE以及UP事件;
此时子View希望依然能够响应MOVE和UP时该咋办呢?
Android给我们提供了一个方法:requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(boolean) 用于设置是否允许拦截,我们在子View的dispatchTouchEvent中直接这么写:
@Override
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
int action = event.getAction();
getParent().requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(true);
switch (action)
{
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
Log.e(TAG, "dispatchTouchEvent ACTION_DOWN");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
Log.e(TAG, "dispatchTouchEvent ACTION_MOVE");
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
Log.e(TAG, "dispatchTouchEvent ACTION_UP");
break; default:
break;
}
return super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
}
getParent().requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(true); 这样即使ViewGroup在MOVE的时候return true,子View依然可以捕获到MOVE以及UP事件。
注:如果ViewGroup在onInterceptTouchEvent(ev) ACTION_DOWN里面直接return true了,那么子View是没有办法的捕获事件的
如果没有找到合适的子View
我们的实例,直接点击ViewGroup内的按钮,当然直接很顺利的走完整个流程;
但是有两种特殊情况
1、ACTION_DOWN的时候,子View.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)返回的为false ;
如果你仔细看了,你会注意到ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent(ev)的ACTION_DOWN代码是这样的
if (child.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {
// Event handled, we have a target now.
mMotionTarget = child;
return true;
}
有在child.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)返回true了,才会认为找到了能够处理当前事件的View,即mMotionTarget = child;
但是如果返回false,那么mMotionTarget 依然是null
mMotionTarget 为null会咋样呢?
其实ViewGroup也是View的子类,如果没有找到能够处理该事件的子View,或者干脆就没有子View;
那么,它作为一个View,就相当于View的事件转发了~~直接super.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
final View target = mMotionTarget;
if (target == null) {
// We don't have a target, this means we're handling the
// event as a regular view.
ev.setLocation(xf, yf);
if ((mPrivateFlags & CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT) != 0) {
ev.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
mPrivateFlags &= ~CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT;
}
return super.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
}
我们没有一个能够处理该事件的目标元素,意味着我们需要自己处理~~~就相当于传统的View~
2、那么什么时候子View.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)返回的为true
如果你仔细看了上篇博客,你会发现只要子View支持点击或者长按事件一定返回true~~
源码是这样的:
if (((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE ||
(viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE)) {
return true ;
总结
1、如果ViewGroup找到了能够处理该事件的View,则直接交给子View处理,自己的onTouchEvent不会被触发;
2、可以通过复写onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)方法,拦截子View的事件(即return true),把事件交给自己处理,则会执行自己对应的onTouchEvent方法
3、子View可以通过调用getParent().requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(true); 阻止ViewGroup对其MOVE或者UP事件进行拦截;
实际应用中能解决哪些问题呢?
比如你需要写一个类似slidingmenu的左侧隐藏menu,主Activity上有个Button、ListView或者任何可以响应点击的View,你在当前View上死命的滑动,菜单栏也出不来;因为MOVE事件被子View处理了,你需要这么做:在ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent中判断用户是不是想显示菜单,如果是,则在onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)拦截子View的事件;自己进行处理,这样自己的onTouchEvent就可以顺利展现出菜单栏了~~
Normal
0
7.8 磅
0
2
false
false
false
EN-US
ZH-CN
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:普通表格;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.5pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;}
ViewGroup的事件机制的更多相关文章
- [学习总结]5、Android的ViewGroup中事件的传递机制(二)
下面是第一篇的连接 Android的ViewGroup中事件的传递机制(一) 关于onInterceptTouchEvent和onTouchEvent的详细解释. 1 public class Mai ...
- [学习总结]4、Android的ViewGroup中事件的传递机制(一)
本文主要针对dispatchTouchEvent,onInterceptTouchEvent,onTouchEvent三个方法,通过简单的例子来简单的介绍下. 根据字面意思的理解,dispatchTo ...
- Android事件机制之一:事件传递和消费
http://www.cnblogs.com/lwbqqyumidi/p/3500997.html 关于Android中的事件机制,用到的地方还是很多的,并且这个知识点还真有点复杂. 在写这篇文章前, ...
- Android View事件机制一些事
本文主要讲述: 自己对View事件机制的一些理解 在项目中遇到的一些坑,解决方案 收集了一些View的事件机制问题 事件的分发原理图 对于一个root viewgroup来说,如果接受了一个点击事件, ...
- Touch事件机制
1.概念 Touch事件分发中有三个主角:Activity.ViewGroup和View.Activity的Touch事件事实上是调用它内部的ViewGroup的Touch事件,可以直接当成ViewG ...
- 【移动端兼容问题研究】javascript事件机制详解(涉及移动兼容)
前言 这篇博客有点长,如果你是高手请您读一读,能对其中的一些误点提出来,以免我误人子弟,并且帮助我提高 如果你是javascript菜鸟,建议您好好读一读,真的理解下来会有不一样的收获 在下才疏学浅, ...
- tkinter事件机制
一.tkinter.Event tkinter的事件机制跟js是一样的,也是只有一个Event类,这个类包罗万象,集成了键盘事件,鼠标事件,包含各种参数. 不像java swing那种强类型事件,sw ...
- [解惑]JavaScript事件机制
群里童鞋问到关于事件传播的一个问题:“事件捕获的时候,阻止冒泡,事件到达目标之后,还会冒泡吗?”. 初学 JS 的童鞋经常会有诸多疑问,我在很多 QQ 群也混了好几年了,耳濡目染也也收获了不少,以后会 ...
- Atitit 数据库的事件机制--触发器与定时任务attilax总结
Atitit 数据库的事件机制--触发器与定时任务attilax总结 1.1. 事件机制的图谱1 2. 触发器的类型2 3. 实现原理 After触发器 Vs Instead Of触发器2 3.1. ...
随机推荐
- fastadmin 页面添加编辑日期时间
添加 <div class="form-group"> <label class="control-label col-xs-12 col-sm-2&q ...
- C++ 新特性 笔记
摘录 constexptr C++14尝鲜:constexpr函数(编译期函数) 总结来说,就是在c++11之前,要实现编译期数值计算需要繁琐的模板元编程.在c++11 中,可以是函数,在一句rutu ...
- [Suricata]无法禁用某些规则的解决办法
背景: 生产环境中部署了suricata,日常规则更新使用suricata-update,如果想禁用某些规则,可以在配置文件/etc/suricata/disable.conf中添加,比如: #禁用规 ...
- webpack拷贝插件 copy-webpack-plugin
copy-webpack-plugin 安装 npm install --save-dev copy-webpack-plugin 作用:在webpack中拷贝文件和文件夹 from 定义要拷贝的源文 ...
- 【u-boot】u-boot中initf_dm()函数执行流程(转)
前部分设备模型初始化 为了便于阅读,删掉部分代码,只留关键的过程: static int initf_dm(void){ int ret; ret = dm_init_and_scan(t ...
- java 使用poi读取word文档存入数据库
使用的poi jar包需要自己下载 读取的word文档中含有多个图片,所以分为两个部分,一个部分读取各个表格中内容,一个是将所有图片截取出来: /** * 遍历段落内容 * docxReadPath ...
- SpringBoot中注入RedisTemplate实例异常解决(转)
最近,在项目开发过程中使用了RedisTemplate,进行单元测试时提示“Field redisTemplate in com.example.demo1.dao.RedisDao required ...
- 关于C# Dockpanel的一些入门的基本操作
关于C# Dockpanel的一些入门的基本操作 原文链接:https://blog.csdn.net/Lc1996Jm/article/details/51881064 一.引用: 1.建立一个Wi ...
- 关于 keepalived+lvs 中参数 persistence_timeout 的说明
在keepalived+lvs的配置文件keepalived.conf中有一个选项persistence_timeout 该选项的作用:在一定时间内使来自于同一个Client的所有TCP请求被负载到同 ...
- python学习_新闻联播文字版爬虫(V 1.0版)
python3的爬虫练习,爬取的是新闻联播文字版网站 #!/usr/bin/env python # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- ''' __author__ = 'wyf349' _ ...