AlphaGo: Mastering the ancient game of Go with Machine Learning

Posted by David Silver and Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind
Games are a great testing ground for developing smarter, more flexible algorithms that have the ability to tackle problems in ways similar to humans. Creating programs that are able to play games better than the best humans has a long history - the first classic game mastered by a computer wasnoughts and crosses (also known as tic-tac-toe) in 1952 as a PhD candidate’s project. Then fellcheckers in 1994. Chess was tackled by Deep Blue in 1997. The success isn’t limited to board games, either - IBM's Watson won first place on Jeopardy in 2011, and in 2014 our own algorithms learned to play dozens of Atari games just from the raw pixel inputs.

But one game has thwarted A.I. research thus far: the ancient game of Go. Invented in China over 2500 years ago, Go is played by more than 40 million people worldwide. The rules are simple: players take turns to place black or white stones on a board, trying to capture the opponent's stones or surround empty space to make points of territory. Confucius wrote about the game, and its aesthetic beauty elevated it to one of the four essential arts required of any true Chinese scholar. The game is played primarily through intuition and feel, and because of its subtlety and intellectual depth it has captured the human imagination for centuries.

But as simple as the rules are, Go is a game of profound complexity. The search space in Go is vast -- more than a googol times larger than chess (a number greater than there are atoms in the universe!). As a result, traditional “brute force” AI methods -- which construct a search tree over all possible sequences of moves -- don’t have a chance in Go. To date, computers have played Go only as well as amateurs. Experts predicted it would be at least another 10 years until a computer could beat one of the world’s elite group of Go professionals.

We saw this as an irresistible challenge! We started building a system, AlphaGo, described in a paper in Nature this week, that would overcome these barriers. The key to AlphaGo is reducing the enormous search space to something more manageable. To do this, it combines a state-of-the-art tree search with two deep neural networks, each of which contains many layers with millions of neuron-like connections. One neural network, the “policy network”, predicts the next move, and is used to narrow the search to consider only the moves most likely to lead to a win. The other neural network, the “value network”, is then used to reduce the depth of the search tree -- estimating the winner in each position in place of searching all the way to the end of the game.

AlphaGo’s search algorithm is much more human-like than previous approaches. For example, when Deep Blue played chess, it searched by brute force over thousands of times more positions than AlphaGo. Instead, AlphaGo looks ahead by playing out the remainder of the game in its imagination, many times over - a technique known as Monte-Carlo tree search. But unlike previous Monte-Carlo programs, AlphaGo uses deep neural networks to guide its search. During each simulated game, the policy network suggests intelligent moves to play, while the value network astutely evaluates the position that is reached. Finally, AlphaGo chooses the move that is most successful in simulation.

We first trained the policy network on 30 million moves from games played by human experts, until it could predict the human move 57% of the time (the previous record before AlphaGo was 44%). But our goal is to beat the best human players, not just mimic them. To do this, AlphaGo learned to discover new strategies for itself, by playing thousands of games between its neural networks, and gradually improving them using a trial-and-error process known as reinforcement learning. This approach led to much better policy networks, so strong in fact that the raw neural network (immediately, without any tree search at all) can defeat state-of-the-art Go programs that build enormous search trees.

These policy networks were in turn used to train the value networks, again by reinforcement learning from games of self-play. These value networks can evaluate any Go position and estimate the eventual winner - a problem so hard it was believed to be impossible.

Of course, all of this requires a huge amount of compute power, so we made extensive use ofGoogle Cloud Platform, which enables researchers working on AI and Machine Learning to access elastic compute, storage and networking capacity on demand. In addition, new open source libraries for numerical computation using data flow graphs, such as TensorFlow, allow researchers to efficiently deploy the computation needed for deep learning algorithms across multiple CPUs or GPUs.

So how strong is AlphaGo? To answer this question, we played a tournament between AlphaGo and the best of the rest - the top Go programs at the forefront of A.I. research. Using a single machine, AlphaGo won all but one of its 500 games against these programs. In fact, AlphaGo even beat those programs after giving them 4 free moves headstart at the beginning of each game. A high-performance version of AlphaGo, distributed across many machines, was even stronger.

This figure from the Nature article shows the Elo rating and approximate rank of AlphaGo (both single machine and distributed versions), the European champion Fan Hui (a professional 2-dan), and the strongest other Go programs, evaluated over thousands of games. Pale pink bars show the performance of other programs when given a four move headstart.

It seemed that AlphaGo was ready for a greater challenge. So we invited the reigning 3-time European Go champion Fan Hui — an elite professional player who has devoted his life to Go since the age of 12 — to our London office for a challenge match. The match was played behind closed doors between October 5-9 last year. AlphaGo won by 5 games to 0 -- the first time a computer program has ever beaten a professional Go player.

AlphaGo’s next challenge will be to play the top Go player in the world over the last decade,Lee Sedol. The match will take place this March in Seoul, South Korea. Lee Sedol is excited to take on the challenge saying, "I am privileged to be the one to play, but I am confident that I can win." It should prove to be a fascinating contest!

We are thrilled to have mastered Go and thus achieved one of the grand challenges of AI. However, the most significant aspect of all this for us is that AlphaGo isn’t just an ‘expert’ system built with hand-crafted rules, but instead uses general machine learning techniques to allow it to improve itself, just by watching and playing games. While games are the perfect platform for developing and testing AI algorithms quickly and efficiently, ultimately we want to apply these techniques to important real-world problems. Because the methods we have used are general purpose, our hope is that one day they could be extended to help us address some of society’s toughest and most pressing problems, from climate modelling to complex disease analysis.

 
from:http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2016/01/alphago-mastering-ancient-game-of-go.html

AlphaGo:用机器学习技术古老的围棋游戏掌握AlphaGo: Mastering the ancient game of Go with Machine Learning的更多相关文章

  1. 数据挖掘:实用机器学习技术P295页:

    数据挖掘:实用机器学习技术P295页: 在weka软件中的实验者界面中,新建好实验项目后,添加相应的实验数据,然后添加对应需要的分类算法 ,需要使用多个算法时候重复操作添加add algorithm. ...

  2. java围棋游戏源代码

    //李雨泽源代码,不可随意修改.//时间:2017年9月22号.//地点:北京周末约科技有限公司.//package com.bao; /*围棋*/ /*import java.awt.*; impo ...

  3. 谷歌发布"自动机器学习"技术 AI可自我创造

    谷歌发布"自动机器学习"技术 AI可自我创造 据Inverse报道,今年5月份,谷歌宣布其人工智能(AI)研究取得重大进展,似乎帮助科幻小说中最耸人听闻的末日预言成为现实.谷歌推出 ...

  4. 使用Java的GUI技术实现 “ 贪吃蛇 ” 游戏

    详细教程: 使用Java的GUI技术实现 " 贪吃蛇 " 游戏_IT打工酱的博客-CSDN博客

  5. 【机器学习Machine Learning】资料大全

    昨天总结了深度学习的资料,今天把机器学习的资料也总结一下(友情提示:有些网站需要"科学上网"^_^) 推荐几本好书: 1.Pattern Recognition and Machi ...

  6. 机器学习(Machine Learning)&深度学习(Deep Learning)资料【转】

    转自:机器学习(Machine Learning)&深度学习(Deep Learning)资料 <Brief History of Machine Learning> 介绍:这是一 ...

  7. 数据挖掘(data mining),机器学习(machine learning),和人工智能(AI)的区别是什么? 数据科学(data science)和商业分析(business analytics)之间有什么关系?

    本来我以为不需要解释这个问题的,到底数据挖掘(data mining),机器学习(machine learning),和人工智能(AI)有什么区别,但是前几天因为有个学弟问我,我想了想发现我竟然也回答 ...

  8. 机器学习笔记1 - Hello World In Machine Learning

    前言 Alpha Go在16年以4:1的战绩打败了李世石,17年又以3:0的战绩战胜了中国围棋天才柯洁,这真是科技界振奋人心的进步.伴随着媒体的大量宣传,此事变成了妇孺皆知的大事件.大家又开始激烈的讨 ...

  9. 学习笔记之机器学习(Machine Learning)

    机器学习 - 维基百科,自由的百科全书 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0 机器学习是人工智能的一个分 ...

随机推荐

  1. virtualenv python的虚拟环境

    官网:https://virtualenv.pypa.io/en/stable/userguide/ virtualenv通过创建独立Python开发环境的工具, 来解决依赖.版本问题 基本使用: d ...

  2. 记录自己在 cmd 中执行 jar 文件遇到的一些错误

    记录自己在 cmd 中执行 jar 文件遇到的一些错误 场景: 请求接口,解析接口返回的 JSON 字符串并插入到我们的数据库里面. 情况: 项目在 eclipse 中正常运行,打成 jar 包后在 ...

  3. 【C#】利用反射构建实体

    using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.D ...

  4. 接口自动化多层嵌套的json数据处理

    最近在做接口自动化测试,响应的内容大多数是多层嵌套的json数据,在对响应数据进行校验的时候,可以通过(key1.key2.key3)形式获取嵌套字典值的方法获取响应值,再和预期值比较 def get ...

  5. mysql协议简析

    前言 如果要在命令行中连接mysql,最常用的便是 mysql -u root -p 这样指定用户名和密码 当然还可以使用远程连接 mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -p 还有一种 ...

  6. Spring boot的hot swapping

    前言 嘛,都是看官方文档的,就先贴上文档地址: using-boot-hot-swapping 使用 使用hot swapping只需要把devtools的jar包添加到你的classpath里. 在 ...

  7. luoguP4284 [SHOI2014]概率充电器 概率期望树形DP

    这是一道告诉我概率没有想象中那么难的题..... 首先,用期望的线性性质,那么答案为所有点有电的概率和 发现一个点的有电的概率来源形成了一个"或"关系,在概率中,这并不好计算... ...

  8. [BZOJ4311]向量(凸包+三分+线段树分治)

    可以发现答案一定在所有向量终点形成的上凸壳上,于是在上凸壳上三分即可. 对于删除操作,相当于每个向量有一个作用区间,线段树分治即可.$O(n\log^2 n)$ 同时可以发现,当询问按斜率排序后,每个 ...

  9. POJ 2406 Power Strings 简单KMP模板 strcmp

    http://poj.org/problem?id=2406 只是模板,但是有趣的是一个strcmp的字符串比较函数,学习到了... https://baike.baidu.com/item/strc ...

  10. HDU 6119 小小粉丝度度熊(Two pointers)

    [题目链接] http://acm.hdu.edu.cn/showproblem.php?pid=6119 [题目大意] 给出一些签到区间和一些补签卡,问可以创造的最长连续签到区间 [题解] 如果我们 ...