oracle group by placement可能导致错误结果的bug
Last week I’ve mentioned on Twitter that we ran into wrong result bug. We found workaround quickly but I’ve decided to spend some time to reproduce error and write blog post to warn you about this optimizer behavior.
Special thanks to my colleague who spotted odd results which led us to this finding.
My test (virtual) environment is:
OS: Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.8
DB: Oracle EE 11.1.0.7.12
In test I will use three tables:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
CONT Name Null Type ------- ---- ------------- CUST_ID NUMBER(38) CODE VARCHAR2(100) CUST Name Null Type ------- -------- ---------- CUST_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(38) DRAG Name Null Type ------- ---- --------- DRAG_ID NUMBER(6) |
To gather fresh statistics for the tables:
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
begin dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> user ,tabname=> 'CONT' ,estimate_percent=>100, cascade => TRUE ); dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> user ,tabname=> 'CUST' ,estimate_percent=>100, cascade => TRUE ); dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> user ,tabname=> 'DRAG' ,estimate_percent=>100, cascade => TRUE ); end ; / |
More details about tables:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
|
select table_name, num_rows, blocks, partitioned, last_analyzed from dba_tables where table_name in ( 'CONT' , 'CUST' , 'DRAG' ); TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS PARTITIONED LAST_ANALYZED ------------ ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------------- CONT 1181949 2892 NO 04.02.2014 14:49:24 DRAG 314 5 NO 04.02.2014 14:49:25 CUST 576233 902 NO 04.02.2014 14:49:25 |
Information about indexes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
select index_name, table_name, uniqueness, distinct_keys, clustering_factor from dba_indexes where table_name in ( 'CONT' , 'CUST' , 'DRAG' ); INDEX_NAME TABLE_NAME UNIQUENESS DISTINCT_KEYS CLUSTERING_FACTOR -------------- ------------ ---------- ------------- ----------------- I_CUST_ID CONT NONUNIQUE 468738 753983 PK_CUST_ID CUST UNIQUE 576233 878 |
We have three small and simple tables with just two indexes. CUST table has primary key on “cust_id” column.
After this little introduction it is time for some tests.
I will flush buffer cache and shared pool before every query execution.
1
2
3
4
5
|
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool; System altered. SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache; System altered. |
First query execution and execution plan:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
select /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ count (co.code) as cnt from drag t, cust cus, cont co where 1=1 and t.drag_id = cus.cust_id and cus.cust_id = co.cust_id(+) group by t.drag_id; CNT --------------- 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 ... 303 rows |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
SQL> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor( null , null , 'ALLSTATS LAST' )); PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL_ID gpnrgy2vawafq, child number 0 ------------------------------------- select /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ count (co.code) as cnt from drag t, cust cus, cont co where 1=1 and t.drag_id = cus.cust_id and cus.cust_id = co.cust_id(+) group by t.drag_id Plan hash value: 3989628059 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E- Rows | A- Rows | A- Time | Buffers | Reads | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 303 |00:00:00.62 | 3734 | 3724 | | | | | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 303 | 303 |00:00:00.62 | 3734 | 3724 | 1096K| 1096K| 1264K (0)| |* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 1 | 792 | 1084 |00:00:00.16 | 3734 | 3724 | 1206K| 1206K| 1244K (0)| |* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 314 | 314 |00:00:00.04 | 890 | 885 | 1452K| 1452K| 1470K (0)| | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DRAG | 1 | 314 | 314 |00:00:00.01 | 7 | 6 | | | | | 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CUST | 1 | 576K| 576K|00:00:00.02 | 883 | 879 | | | | | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CONT | 1 | 1181K| 1181K|00:00:00.01 | 2844 | 2839 | | | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - access( "CUS" . "CUST_ID" = "CO" . "CUST_ID" ) 3 - access( "T" . "DRAG_ID" = "CUS" . "CUST_ID" ) |
Check result of the query - this is correct query result.
Now to simulate what we experienced in production.
1
2
3
4
|
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool; System altered. SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache; System altered. |
With hint I want to force PK_CUST_ID index usage because this was preferred plan in production.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
select /*+ gather_plan_statistics index (cus PK_CUST_ID) */ count (co.code) as cnt from drag t, cust cus, cont co where 1=1 and t.drag_id = cus.cust_id and cus.cust_id = co.cust_id(+) group by t.drag_id; CNT --------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 303 rows |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
|
SQL> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor( null , null , 'ALLSTATS LAST' )); PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SQL_ID 9vf9uf7mhdmdz, child number 0 ------------------------------------- select /*+ gather_plan_statistics index (cus PK_CUST_ID) */ count (co.code) as cnt from drag t, cust cus, cont co where 1=1 and t.drag_id = cus.cust_id and cus.cust_id = co.cust_id(+) group by t.drag_id Plan hash value: 3263881209 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E- Rows | A- Rows | A- Time | Buffers | Reads | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 303 |00:00:00.70 | 3459 | 3094 | | | | | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 303 | 303 |00:00:00.70 | 3459 | 3094 | 934K| 934K| 1267K (0)| |* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 1 | 764 | 1046 |00:00:00.22 | 3459 | 3094 | 1134K| 1134K| 1198K (0)| | 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 303 | 303 |00:00:02.02 | 615 | 255 | | | | | 4 | VIEW | VW_GBC_9 | 1 | 303 | 303 |00:00:00.01 | 7 | 6 | | | | | 5 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 303 | 303 |00:00:00.01 | 7 | 6 | 1012K| 1012K| 1249K (0)| | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DRAG | 1 | 314 | 314 |00:00:00.01 | 7 | 6 | | | | |* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_CUST_ID | 303 | 1 | 303 |00:00:00.22 | 608 | 249 | | | | | 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CONT | 1 | 1181K| 1181K|00:00:00.01 | 2844 | 2839 | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - access( "CUS" . "CUST_ID" = "CO" . "CUST_ID" ) 7 - access( "ITEM_1" = "CUS" . "CUST_ID" ) |
Check result of the query!
Count is displaying all 0 values because it received only NULLs to count.
Other functions like max and min are also affected by this error.
Check steps 4,5 and 6 in execution plan.
Instead of quick full scan on DRAG table Oracle transformed query and created inline view using smart group-by optimization.
In 10053 trace I could easily find what Oracle was doing.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
SELECT /*+ INDEX ( "CUS" "PK_CUST_ID" ) */ SUM ( "VW_GBC_9" . "ITEM_2" ) "CNT" FROM ( SELECT "T" . "DRAG_ID" "ITEM_1" , COUNT ( "CO" . "CODE" ) "ITEM_2" , "T" . "DRAG_ID" "ITEM_3" FROM "ADMIN" . "DRAG" "T" WHERE 1=1 GROUP BY "T" . "DRAG_ID" , "T" . "DRAG_ID" ) "VW_GBC_9" , "ADMIN" . "CUST" "CUS" , "ADMIN" . "CONT" "CO" WHERE "VW_GBC_9" . "ITEM_1" = "CUS" . "CUST_ID" AND "CUS" . "CUST_ID" = "CO" . "CUST_ID" (+) GROUP BY "VW_GBC_9" . "ITEM_3" ; |
Quick workaround to fix this bug:
- Set "_optimizer_group_by_placement"=FALSE.
You could check in 10053 trace value of this parameter.
In my case: _optimizer_group_by_placement = true
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
|
SQL> alter session set "_optimizer_group_by_placement" = FALSE ; Session altered. select /*+ gather_plan_statistics index (cus PK_CUST_ID) */ count (co.code) as cnt from drag t, cust cus, cont co where 1=1 and t.drag_id = cus.cust_id and cus.cust_id = co.cust_id(+) group by t.drag_id; CNT ---------- 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 ... 303 rows |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
|
SQL> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor( null , null , 'ALLSTATS LAST' )); PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL_ID a91bzhvupzquh, child number 0 ------------------------------------- select /*+ gather_plan_statistics index (cus PK_CUST_ID)*/ count (co.code) as cnt from drag t, cust cus, cont co where 1=1 and t.drag_id = cus.cust_id and cus.cust_id = co.cust_id(+) group by t.drag_id Plan hash value: 2460166079 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E- Rows | A- Rows | A- Time | Buffers | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 303 |00:00:00.16 | 3481 | | | | | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 303 | 303 |00:00:00.16 | 3481 | 1096K| 1096K| 1232K (0)| |* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 1 | 792 | 1084 |00:00:00.01 | 3481 | 1206K| 1206K| 1529K (0)| | 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 314 | 314 |00:00:00.01 | 637 | | | | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DRAG | 1 | 314 | 314 |00:00:00.01 | 7 | | | | |* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN| PK_CUST_ID | 314 | 1 | 314 |00:00:00.01 | 630 | | | | | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CONT | 1 | 1181K| 1181K|00:00:00.01 | 2844 | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - access( "CUS" . "CUST_ID" = "CO" . "CUST_ID" ) 5 - access( "T" . "DRAG_ID" = "CUS" . "CUST_ID" ) 27 rows selected. |
Oracle Support note associated with "_optimizer_group_by_placement" parameter.
Note.8945586.8 Ext/Pub Bug 8945586 - Wrong results using GROUP BY placement:
Description
Wrong results can occur when using GROUP BY placement where the aggregate column gets pruned from select list.
I’ve even found that “_optimizer_group_by_placement” parameter was mentioned in "Oracle® Fusion Middleware Oracle WebCenter Analytics Installation and Upgrade Guide".
Oracle 11g (11.1.0.6 and above) in default or Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) configuration
When running Oracle 11g versions prior to 11.1.0.7.0 the Oracle system parameter _optimizer_group_by_placement must be set to false. This can either be set in the init.ora file of the respective database instances or by by issuing an ALTER SYSTEM command as follows:
SQLPLUS /nolog
CONNECT / AS SYSDBA
ALTER SYSTEM SET "_optimizer_group_by_placement"=false
group by的优化bug还是挺多的,还有比如_optimizer_aggr_groupby_elim,但是不出bug的情况下,性能提升还是非常明显的,大家一定要仔细检查结果,不要只看性能。
oracle group by placement可能导致错误结果的bug的更多相关文章
- oracle已知会导致错误结果的bug列表(Bug Issues Known to cause Wrong Results)
LAST UPDATE: 1 Dec 15, 2016 APPLIES TO: 1 2 3 4 Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition - Versi ...
- django继承修改 User表导致的问题 fields.E304(permissions/group都会有这样的错误)
问题: django继承修改 User表时,进行migrations操作时会导致的问题 fields.E304(permissions/group都会有这样的错误)如图: 根源: django文档中有 ...
- 登陆Oracle,报oracle initializationg or shutdown in progress 错误提示
前两天,登陆Oracle,发现登陆不上去了,报”oracle initializationg or shutdown in progress 错误提示” 错误. 然后就想着怎么去解决,首先自己到win ...
- oracle:数据库版本问题导致的bug
公司开发出来的系统,由于各现场oracle数据库版本有10.2.0.4.11.2.0.1.11.2.0.3.11.2.0.4: 进而会导致版本不一导致错误问题.下面列举2个: 1.wm_concat ...
- Oracle ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress 错误解决办法
Oracle ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress 错误解决办法 登陆数据库时提示 “ORA-01033”错误在命令窗口以s ...
- oracle group by中cube和rollup字句的使用方法及区别
oracle group by中rollup和cube的区别: Oracle的GROUP BY语句除了最基本的语法外,还支持ROLLUP和CUBE语句. 如果是ROLLUP(A, B, C)的话,先 ...
- oracle所在磁盘空间不足导致了数据库异常
oracle所在磁盘空间不足导致了数据库异常.需要减小数据文件的大小来解决. 1.检查数据文件的名称和编号 select file#,name from v$datafile; 2.看哪个数据文件所占 ...
- MVC4 路由参数带点 文件名后缀导致错误
错误描述 最近在研究office在线预览,用到mvc4 apicontroller 需要传参是文件名,如test.docx导致错误"指定的目录或文件在 Web 服务器上不存在", ...
- Oracle问题之ORA-12560TNS:协议适配器错误
Oracle问题之ORA-12560TNS:协议适配器错误 一.造成ORA-12560: TNS: 协议适配器错误的问题的原因有三个: 1.监听服务没有起起来.windows平台个一如下操作:开始-- ...
随机推荐
- Spring AOP @AspectJ 入门基础
需要的类包: 1.一个简单的例子 Waiter接口: package com.yyq.annotation; public interface Waiter { void greetTo(String ...
- Educational Codeforces Round 1
598A - Tricky Sum 20171103$$ans=\frac{n(n+1)}{2} - 2\sum_{k=0}^{\left \lfloor \log_2 n \right \rf ...
- vim 命令补充(1)
本篇文章主要教你如何使用 Vim 分屏功能. 分屏启动Vim 使用大写的O参数来垂直分屏. vim -On file1 file2 ... 使用小写的o参数来水平分屏. vim -on file1 f ...
- Oracle课程档案,第二天
salary:工资 order by:排序 desc:降序 hire:雇佣 单行函数 一周有七天 一月不一定只有30天 trunc:截取 dual:空表 last:最后 month:月份 round: ...
- 黑盒测试实践——day01
一.任务进展情况 小组成员讨论了测试案例的选取以及测试工具的选取,目前正在设计合理的测试方法,研究待测试系统的功能需求和缺陷. 二.存在的问题 测试工具的使用还是不很清楚. 三.解决方法 通过上网搜集 ...
- Dubbo 分布式服务框架入门
要想了解 Dubbo 是什么,我们不防先了解它有什么用.使用场景:比如我想开发一个网上商城项目,这个网上商城呢,比较复杂,分为 pc 端 web 管理后台,微信端销售公众号,那么我们分成四个项目,pc ...
- AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'isdigit'(python下的isdigit函数)
python下的isdigit函数: isdigit() 方法检测字符串是否只由数字组成. 语法 isdigit()方法语法: str.isdigit() 示例代码如下: 结果: 我想说的重点在于 ...
- plsvo
1 图像对齐 std::for_each(ref_frame->seg_fts_.begin(), ref_frame->seg_fts_.end(), [&](plsvo::Fe ...
- jq1.9.0以上版本不兼容live()解决方法
最近一个项目里用bootstrap做图形渲染,需要用到jq1.9以上版本,而copy的js代码里用到了live()方法,故两者产生了兼容问题,下面是解决方案: $('#my').on("cl ...
- Codeforces 1138 - A/B/C/D/E - (Undone)
链接:https://codeforces.com/contest/1137 A - Skyscrapers 题解:对于每一段 $1$ 和每一段 $2$,统计他们的长度.因此对于相邻的两段长度求较小值 ...