Spark Core（四）用LogQuery的例子来说明Executor是如何运算RDD的算子（转载）

1. 究竟是怎么运行的？

很多的博客里大量的讲了什么是RDD, Dependency, Shuffle.......但是究竟那些Executor是怎么运行你提交的代码段的？

下面是一个日志分析的例子，来自Spark的example

def main(args: Array[String]) {
  val sparkConf = new SparkConf().setAppName("Log Query")
  val sc = new SparkContext(sparkConf)
  val dataSet =
    if (args.length == ) sc.textFile(args()) else sc.parallelize(exampleApacheLogs)
  // scalastyle:off
  val apacheLogRegex =
    """^([\d.]+) (\S+) (\S+)
([\w\d:/]+\s[+\-]\d4)
 "(.+?)" (\d{}) ([\d\-]+) "([^"]+)" "([^"]+)".*""".r
  // scalastyle:on
  /** Tracks the total query count and number of aggregate bytes for a particular group. */
  class Stats(val count: Int, val numBytes: Int) extends Serializable {
    def merge(other: Stats): Stats = {
      new Stats(count + other.count, numBytes + other.numBytes)
    }
    override def toString: String = "bytes=%s\tn=%s".format(numBytes, count)
  }  

  def extractKey(line: String): (String, String, String) = {
    apacheLogRegex.findFirstIn(line) match {
      case Some(apacheLogRegex(ip, _, user, dateTime, query, status, bytes, referer, ua)) =>
        if (user != "\"-\"") (ip, user, query)
        else (null, null, null)
      case _ => (null, null, null)
    }
  }  

  def extractStats(line: String): Stats = {
    apacheLogRegex.findFirstIn(line) match {
      case Some(apacheLogRegex(ip, _, user, dateTime, query, status, bytes, referer, ua)) =>
        new Stats(, bytes.toInt)
      case _ => new Stats(, )
    }
  }  

  dataSet.map(line => (extractKey(line), extractStats(line)))
    .reduceByKey((c, d) => c.merge(d))
    .collect().foreach{
      case (user, query) => println("%s\t%s".format(user, query))}  

  sc.stop()
}  

在map的RDD算子里，自定义了extractKey, extractStats函数，而在reduceByKey的RDD又自定义了一个相同的key的merge函数

这些函数是如何被传递到executor里并且进行运算的呢？

1.1 RDD,ShuffleDependency

在前面的博文（Executor上是如何launch task的）中，已经讨论过如何获取到Driver的RDD, Dependency, 那么RDD如何能够运行这些函数呢？

 

Execute获取的DAG里提交的ShuffleMapTask是在TaskDecription中serializedTask中反序列化出来

ShuffleMapTask的RunTask的方法

override def runTask(context: TaskContext): MapStatus = {
   // Deserialize the RDD using the broadcast variable.
   val threadMXBean = ManagementFactory.getThreadMXBean
   val deserializeStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis()
   val deserializeStartCpuTime = if (threadMXBean.isCurrentThreadCpuTimeSupported) {
     threadMXBean.getCurrentThreadCpuTime
   } else 0L
   val ser = SparkEnv.get.closureSerializer.newInstance()
   val (rdd, dep) = ser.deserialize[(RDD[_], ShuffleDependency[_, _, _])](
     ByteBuffer.wrap(taskBinary.value), Thread.currentThread.getContextClassLoader)
   _executorDeserializeTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - deserializeStartTime
   _executorDeserializeCpuTime = if (threadMXBean.isCurrentThreadCpuTimeSupported) {
     threadMXBean.getCurrentThreadCpuTime - deserializeStartCpuTime
   } else 0L  

   var writer: ShuffleWriter[Any, Any] = null
   try {
     val manager = SparkEnv.get.shuffleManager
     writer = manager.getWriter[Any, Any](dep.shuffleHandle, partitionId, context)
     writer.write(rdd.iterator(partition, context).asInstanceOf[Iterator[_ <: Product2[Any, Any]]])
     writer.stop(success = true).get
   } catch {
     case e: Exception =>
       try {
         if (writer != null) {
           writer.stop(success = false)
         }
       } catch {
         case e: Exception =>
           log.debug("Could not stop writer", e)
       }
       throw e
   }
 }  

看到了通过shufflewrite去写迭代的rdd数据

1.1.1 ShuffleWrite

ShuffleWrite的构建是通过shuffleManager来获取的，在SortShuffleManager.scala中

/** Get a writer for a given partition. Called on executors by map tasks. */
 override def getWriter[K, V](
     handle: ShuffleHandle,
     mapId: Int,
     context: TaskContext): ShuffleWriter[K, V] = {
   numMapsForShuffle.putIfAbsent(
     handle.shuffleId, handle.asInstanceOf[BaseShuffleHandle[_, _, _]].numMaps)
   val env = SparkEnv.get
   handle match {
     case unsafeShuffleHandle: SerializedShuffleHandle[K @unchecked, V @unchecked] =>
       new UnsafeShuffleWriter(
         env.blockManager,
         shuffleBlockResolver.asInstanceOf[IndexShuffleBlockResolver],
         context.taskMemoryManager(),
         unsafeShuffleHandle,
         mapId,
         context,
         env.conf)
     case bypassMergeSortHandle: BypassMergeSortShuffleHandle[K @unchecked, V @unchecked] =>
       new BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter(
         env.blockManager,
         shuffleBlockResolver.asInstanceOf[IndexShuffleBlockResolver],
         bypassMergeSortHandle,
         mapId,
         context,
         env.conf)
     case other: BaseShuffleHandle[K @unchecked, V @unchecked, _] =>
       new SortShuffleWriter(shuffleBlockResolver, other, mapId, context)
   }
 }  

在ShuffleDependency中保存着ShuffleHandle, ShuffleHandle中也保存着Dependency

1. 在Driver DAG 中registerShuffle中dependency决定着使用什么ShuffleHandle
2. 在Executor的shuffleManager中是由dependency中的ShuffleHandle来决定什么ShuffleWrite

题外话：Dependency本身就可以直接决定shuffleWrite,整个ShuffleHandle只是在SortShuffleWriter的时候用于获取了dependency, Executor端SortShuffleWriter本身就能获取到Dependency，ShuffleHandle感觉就是一个鸡肋。

 

在日志分析的这个代码案例中，返回的是SortShuffleWriter

1.1.2 RDD.iterator

在ShuffleMapTask中的runTask方法

writer.write(rdd.iterator(partition, context).asInstanceOf[Iterator[_ <: Product2[Any, Any]]]) 

writer在调用的write函数中传递了rdd.iterator，也就是通过rdd构造的迭代器

final def iterator(split: Partition, context: TaskContext): Iterator[T] = {
   if (storageLevel != StorageLevel.NONE) {
     getOrCompute(split, context)
   } else {
     computeOrReadCheckpoint(split, context)
   }
 }  

Map的rdd的构造迭代器MapPartitionsRDD，MapPartitionsRDD并没有设置缓存或者存储，StorageLevel是NONE，调用computerOrReadCheckpoint方法

/**
 * Compute an RDD partition or read it from a checkpoint if the RDD is checkpointing.
 */
private[spark] def computeOrReadCheckpoint(split: Partition, context: TaskContext): Iterator[T] =
{
  if (isCheckpointedAndMaterialized) {
    firstParent[T].iterator(split, context)
  } else {
    compute(split, context)
  }
}  

也没有做过checkpointed ，调用compute方法

override def compute(split: Partition, context: TaskContext): Iterator[U] =
  f(context, split.index, firstParent[T].iterator(split, context))  

先来看fistParent

/** Returns the first parent RDD */
protected[spark] def firstParent[U: ClassTag]: RDD[U] = {
  dependencies.head.rdd.asInstanceOf[RDD[U]]
}  

每个RDD都会保存一个Dependency的数组，Dependency里有RDD的属性，而Dependency数组的头一个dependency的RDD，就是处理数据的首个RDD，也就是如下的代码里的dataSet

val dataSet =
      if (args.length == ) sc.textFile(args()) else sc.parallelize(exampleApacheLogs)  

我们以parallelize为例子，所对应的RDD就是ParallelCollectionRDD回到

firstParent[T].iterator(split, context))  

iterator函数就是前面的RDD函数，StorageLevel依然是NONE，也没有做过checkpointed，依然还是调用compute的方法

override def compute(s: Partition, context: TaskContext): Iterator[T] = {
  new InterruptibleIterator(context, s.asInstanceOf[ParallelCollectionPartition[T]].iterator)
}  

生成了一个InterruptibleIterator迭代器，迭代器本质只是一个代理的迭代器

@DeveloperApi
class InterruptibleIterator[+T](val context: TaskContext, val delegate: Iterator[T])
  extends Iterator[T] {  

  def hasNext: Boolean = {
    // TODO(aarondav/rxin): Check Thread.interrupted instead of context.interrupted if interrupt
    // is allowed. The assumption is that Thread.interrupted does not have a memory fence in read
    // (just a volatile field in C), while context.interrupted is a volatile in the JVM, which
    // introduces an expensive read fence.
    if (context.isInterrupted) {
      throw new TaskKilledException
    } else {
      delegate.hasNext
    }
  }  

  def next(): T = delegate.next()
}  

当发现有打断命令的时候，直接抛出TaskKilledException的异常，其所代理的iterator 是

s.asInstanceOf[ParallelCollectionPartition[T]].iterator 

ParallelCollectionRDD的Partition就是ParallelCollectionPartition

private[spark] class ParallelCollectionPartition[T: ClassTag](
    var rddId: Long,
    var slice: Int,
    var values: Seq[T]
  ) extends Partition with Serializable {  

  def iterator: Iterator[T] = values.iterator
   .......
}  

Values是需要支持序列化的数组，在Driver端ParallelCollectionRDD中将数据Data进行了ParallelCollectionPartition的分片，分片的数据Values被保存在了ParallelCollectionPartition里，数据并没有被保存在ParallelCollectionRDD中，所以进行计算的数据并不是通过RDD传递过来的，而是通过反序列化ShuffleMapTask获得的，走的是直接的rpc通道

private[spark] class ShuffleMapTask(
    stageId: Int,
    stageAttemptId: Int,
    taskBinary: Broadcast[Array[Byte]],
    partition: Partition,
    @transient private var locs: Seq[TaskLocation],
    metrics: TaskMetrics,
    localProperties: Properties,
    jobId: Option[Int] = None,
    appId: Option[String] = None,
    appAttemptId: Option[String] = None)
  extends Task[MapStatus](stageId, stageAttemptId, partition.index, metrics, localProperties, jobId,
    appId, appAttemptId)  

回到MapPartitionsRDD原来的函数中去：

override def compute(split: Partition, context: TaskContext): Iterator[U] =
  f(context, split.index, firstParent[T].iterator(split, context))  

要看看f是什么？RDD.map函数

def map[U: ClassTag](f: T => U): RDD[U] = withScope {
  val cleanF = sc.clean(f)
  new MapPartitionsRDD[U, T](this, (context, pid, iter) => iter.map(cleanF))
}  

我们在看看我们是如何调用map函数的：

dataSet.map(line => (extractKey(line), extractStats(line)))

f(context, split.index, firstParent[T].iterator(split, context))就是调用了(context, pid,iter) =>iter.map(cleanF) 关键的是iter.map函数这是scala的基本函数，查看scala代码Iterator.scala

def map[B](f: A => B): Iterator[B] = new AbstractIterator[B] {
   def hasNext = self.hasNext
   def next() = f(self.next())
 }  

返回的可以简单的认为AbstractIterator，self 指向的是InterruptibleIterator，f 就是 line => (extractKey(line), extractStats(line))
我们来看ExternalSorter.scala通过迭代器获取Partiton的数据并进行运算的代码

while (records.hasNext) {
        addElementsRead()
        kv = records.next()
        map.changeValue((getPartition(kv._1), kv._1), update)
        maybeSpillCollection(usingMap = true)
      }  

• AbstractIterator.hasNext -> InterruptibleIterator.hasNext ->  Elements( Seq.interator).hasNext -> def hasNext: Boolean = index < end
• AbstractIterator.next() -> InterruptibleIterator.next() -> Elements( Seq.interator).next(). -> f(InterruptibleIterator.next()) ->(extractKey(InterruptibleIterator.next()), extractStats(InterruptibleIterator.next()))

运算extractKey, extractStats后返回的是一个Product2[Tuple3(String,String,String),Stats] KV值

 

还记得executor会loadDriver的jar么？虽然在scala里所定义函数都默认支持反序列化，但是在运行方法并不需要反序列化，只要加载jar包，classload 这个我们写的driver的类就可以了。

1.1.3 reduceByKey算子

在LogQuery中

.reduceByKey((c, d) => c.merge(d))  

我们来看PairRDDFunction.scala中的reduceByKey，为什么PairRDDFunction不是RDD在前面的博客已经描述过

def reduceByKey(partitioner: Partitioner, func: (V, V) => V): RDD[(K, V)] = self.withScope {
    combineByKeyWithClassTag[V]((v: V) => v, func, func, partitioner)
  }  

combineByKeyWithClassTag函数中

def combineByKeyWithClassTag[C](
      createCombiner: V => C,
      mergeValue: (C, V) => C,
      mergeCombiners: (C, C) => C,
      partitioner: Partitioner,
      mapSideCombine: Boolean = true,
      serializer: Serializer = null)(implicit ct: ClassTag[C]): RDD[(K, C)] = self.withScope {
    require(mergeCombiners != null, "mergeCombiners must be defined") // required as of Spark 0.9.0
    if (keyClass.isArray) {
      if (mapSideCombine) {
        throw new SparkException("Cannot use map-side combining with array keys.")
      }
      if (partitioner.isInstanceOf[HashPartitioner]) {
        throw new SparkException("HashPartitioner cannot partition array keys.")
      }
    }
    val aggregator = new Aggregator[K, V, C](
      self.context.clean(createCombiner),
      self.context.clean(mergeValue),
      self.context.clean(mergeCombiners))
    if (self.partitioner == Some(partitioner)) {
      self.mapPartitions(iter => {
        val context = TaskContext.get()
        new InterruptibleIterator(context, aggregator.combineValuesByKey(iter, context))
      }, preservesPartitioning = true)
    } else {
      new ShuffledRDD[K, V, C](self, partitioner)
        .setSerializer(serializer)
        .setAggregator(aggregator)
        .setMapSideCombine(mapSideCombine)
    }
  }  

在以前都没有介绍过Aggregator，我们来介绍一下这个Aggregator，Aggregator有三个关键函数

1. createCombiner: 通过Map获得的新KV, 在Key不存在的情况下将V转化为C
2. mergeValue: 通过Map获得的新KV, 在已经存在相同的Key情况下，将新获得的V聚合到C
3. mergeCombiners: 分布式计算的时候，最后要每个RDD的分区最后汇总，汇总的时候对相同的Key，已经聚合的C和另一个分区已经聚合的C再次聚合

在logquery的例子中，mergeValue, mergeCombiners 就是 (c,d)  =>c.merge(d)            createCombiner就是 stats不变

还是回到ExternalSorter.scala的insertAll中

val mergeValue = aggregator.get.mergeValue
      val createCombiner = aggregator.get.createCombiner
      var kv: Product2[K, V] = null
      val update = (hadValue: Boolean, oldValue: C) => {
        if (hadValue) mergeValue(oldValue, kv._2) else createCombiner(kv._2)
      }
      while (records.hasNext) {
        addElementsRead()
        kv = records.next()
        map.changeValue((getPartition(kv._1), kv._1), update)
        maybeSpillCollection(usingMap = true)
      }  

我们看到在map.changeValue的时候，通过update的方法更新相同的key

val update = (hadValue: Boolean, oldValue: C) => {
        if (hadValue) mergeValue(oldValue, kv._2) else createCombiner(kv._2)
      }  

mergeValue,createCombiner就是从Aggregator中获取到的，而Aggregator被保存在ShuffledRDD和ShuffledDependency中，ShuffledDependency是通过Driver RPC传递给Executor的，所以可以从ShuffledDependency获取到Aggregator，通过Aggregator里指定的算法进行KV的操作，而mergeValue就是Driver中的c.merge(d)，因为c 是stats 对象

class Stats(val count: Int, val numBytes: Int) extends Serializable {
  def merge(other: Stats): Stats = {
    new Stats(count + other.count, numBytes + other.numBytes)
  }
  override def toString: String = "bytes=%s\tn=%s".format(numBytes, count)
}  

调用了Stats.merge的方法

2. 总结

• 通过反序列化RDD(不是ShuffleRDD)，通过Dependency的列表获的最初获取数据的RDD的迭代器A
• Map算子对迭代器A重新封装AbstractIterator，在迭代器A获取结果后进行Map算子里的函数调用line => (extractKey(line), extractStats(line)),返回KV的结果
• reduceByKey算子里的函数传递是通过ShuffledDependency里的aggregator进行传递
• Executor 只要对迭代器AbstractIterator进行迭代获取KV，调用aggregator里的方法进行相同的K对V进行操作，完成Driver里面的main函数定义的RDD运算。