利用no_merge优化
SQL> select a.unit3_code 机构编码,
2 a.unit3_name 机构名称,
3 a.dept1_code 部门编码,
4 a.dept1_name 部门名称,
5 a.mgr_code 客户经理编码,
6 a.mgr_name 客户经理名称,
7 b.base 基数
8 from s_pm_mgr_dept_rela a,
9 (select t2.mgr_code, sum(T1.avg * t2.share_rate / 100) / 10000 base
10 from (select acct_no_pk,
11 (SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20121217', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) -
12 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20120101', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) +
13 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE,
14 '20120101',
15 T1.ADJUST_AMT_AF,
16 0))) /
17 PKG_UF_BANK.FN_GETDAYS('20120101', '20121217') AVG
18 from t_pm_acct_dtl_af t1
19 where 1 = 1
20 and t1.data_date in ('20120101', '20121217')
21 and acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT'
22 and t1.cur_code = 1
23 and substr(flag, 1, 1) = '1'
24 and substr(flag, 4, 1) = '1'
25 and t1.dept1_code <> '999999999'
26 group by acct_no_pk) t1,
27 (select t3.acct_no_pk as acct_no_pk,
28 NVL(t2.cm_code, nvl(T3.MGR_CODE, 'xxxxxx')) as mgr_code,
29 decode(T1.SHARE_RATE, '', 100, T1.SHARE_RATE) as share_rate
30 from t_pm_acct_dtl t3,
31 bap_cm_account t1,
32 bap_cm_psndoc t2,
33 bap_nctobapdept t4
34 where 1 = 1
35 and t1.account(+) = t3.acct_no_pk
36 and decode(t1.seal_flag(+), '', 'N', t1.seal_flag(+)) = 'N'
37 and replace(t1.effect_date(+), '-') <= '20121217'
38 and replace(decode(t1.seal_date(+),
39 '',
40 pkg_uf_bank.FN_GETNEXTDAY('20121217',
41 'M'),
42 t1.seal_date(+)),
43 '-') > '20121217'
44 and decode(t1.dr(+), '', 0, t1.dr(+)) = 0
45 and t1.pk_cm_psndoc = t2
46 .pk_cm_psndoc(+)
47 and decode(t2.dr(+), '', 0, t2.dr(+)) = 0
48 and t2.pk_dept = t4.pk_nctobapdept(+)
49 and t4.deptcode(+) <> '999999999'
50 and t3.data_date = '20121217'
51 and t3.acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT') t2
52 Where t1.acct_no_pk = t2.acct_no_pk
53 group by t2.mgr_code) b
54 where a.mgr_code = b.mgr_code
55 and a.dept1_code <> '999999999'
56 and a.dept1_code = '18605'
57 and a.unit3_code = '18601'
58 and 1 = 1
59 and a.mgr_code IN ('00798', '00817')
60 order by 1, 3, 5
61 ; Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1749794338 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 288 | 11414 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 288 | 11414 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 1 | 288 | 11413 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
|* 3 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 258 | 11408 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 207 | 11407 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 139 | 11402 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 7 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1 | 98 | 11398 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 8 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | | | |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PM_MGR_DEPT_RELA | 1 | 63 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MGR_DEPT_RELA_IDX5 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 11 | BUFFER SORT | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 12 | VIEW | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 13 | HASH GROUP BY | | 93 | 5487 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 14 | PARTITION LIST INLIST | | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL_AF | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
| 16 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| T_PM_ACCT_DTL | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ACCT_DTL_IDX1 | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 1 | 68 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 22 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_NCTOBAPDEPT | 609 | 18270 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("T2"."PK_DEPT"="T4"."PK_NCTOBAPDEPT"(+))
3 - filter("A"."MGR_CODE"=NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx')) AND
(NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00798' OR
NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00817'))
9 - filter("A"."DEPT1_CODE"='18605' AND "A"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999')
10 - access("A"."UNIT3_CODE"='18601' AND ("A"."MGR_CODE"='00798' OR "A"."MGR_CODE"='00817'))
15 - filter("ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",1,1)='1' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",4,1)='1' AND
"T1"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999' AND TO_NUMBER("T1"."CUR_CODE")=1)
17 - filter("T3"."ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT')
18 - access("T3"."DATA_DATE"=20121217 AND "T1"."ACCT_NO_PK"="T3"."ACCT_NO_PK")
19 - filter(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+),'','N',"T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+))='N' AND
REPLACE("T1"."EFFECT_DATE"(+),'-')<='20121217' AND DECODE(TO_CHAR("T1"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T1"."DR"(+))=0 AND
REPLACE(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+),'',"PKG_UF_BANK"."FN_GETNEXTDAY"('20121217','M'),"T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+)),'-')>'20121217
')
20 - access("T1"."ACCOUNT"(+)="T3"."ACCT_NO_PK")
21 - filter(DECODE(TO_CHAR("T2"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T2"."DR"(+))=0)
22 - access("T1"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"="T2"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"(+))
23 - filter("T4"."DEPTCODE"(+)<>'999999999') Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
214 recursive calls
0 db block gets
11912102 consistent gets
122578 physical reads
13516 redo size
1064 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1625 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
2 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed
select count(*) from S_PM_MGR_DEPT_RELA A where ("A"."UNIT3_CODE"='18601' AND ("A"."MGR_CODE"='00798' OR "A"."MGR_CODE"='00817'))
and ("A"."DEPT1_CODE"='18605' AND "A"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999');
---返回2条记录 (select acct_no_pk,
11 (SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20121217', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) -
12 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20120101', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) +
13 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE,
14 '20120101',
15 T1.ADJUST_AMT_AF,
16 0))) /
17 PKG_UF_BANK.FN_GETDAYS('20120101', '20121217') AVG
18 from t_pm_acct_dtl_af t1
19 where 1 = 1
20 and t1.data_date in ('20120101', '20121217')
21 and acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT'
22 and t1.cur_code = 1
23 and substr(flag, 1, 1) = '1'
24 and substr(flag, 4, 1) = '1'
25 and t1.dept1_code <> '999999999'
26 group by acct_no_pk) t1 (select t3.acct_no_pk as acct_no_pk,
28 NVL(t2.cm_code, nvl(T3.MGR_CODE, 'xxxxxx')) as mgr_code,
29 decode(T1.SHARE_RATE, '', 100, T1.SHARE_RATE) as share_rate
30 from t_pm_acct_dtl t3,
31 bap_cm_account t1,
32 bap_cm_psndoc t2,
33 bap_nctobapdept t4
34 where 1 = 1
35 and t1.account(+) = t3.acct_no_pk
36 and decode(t1.seal_flag(+), '', 'N', t1.seal_flag(+)) = 'N'
37 and replace(t1.effect_date(+), '-') <= '20121217'
38 and replace(decode(t1.seal_date(+),
39 '',
40 pkg_uf_bank.FN_GETNEXTDAY('20121217',
41 'M'),
42 t1.seal_date(+)),
43 '-') > '20121217'
44 and decode(t1.dr(+), '', 0, t1.dr(+)) = 0
45 and t1.pk_cm_psndoc = t2
46 .pk_cm_psndoc(+)
47 and decode(t2.dr(+), '', 0, t2.dr(+)) = 0
48 and t2.pk_dept = t4.pk_nctobapdept(+)
49 and t4.deptcode(+) <> '999999999'
50 and t3.data_date = '20121217'
51 and t3.acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT') t2 | 12 | VIEW | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 13 | HASH GROUP BY | | 93 | 5487 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 14 | PARTITION LIST INLIST | | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL_AF | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
| 16 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| T_PM_ACCT_DTL | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ACCT_DTL_IDX1 | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 1 | 68 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 22 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_NCTOBAPDEPT | 609 | 18270 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 可以看到t1视图没有展开,但是t2视图确被展开了,尝试让t2视图不展开 SQL> select a.unit3_code 机构编码,
2 a.unit3_name 机构名称,
3 a.dept1_code 部门编码,
4 a.dept1_name 部门名称,
5 a.mgr_code 客户经理编码,
6 a.mgr_name 客户经理名称,
7 b.base 基数
8 from s_pm_mgr_dept_rela a,
9 (select /*+ no_merge(t2)*/ t2.mgr_code, sum(T1.avg * t2.share_rate / 100) / 10000 base
10 from (select acct_no_pk,
11 (SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20121217', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) -
12 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20120101', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) +
13 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE,
14 '20120101',
15 T1.ADJUST_AMT_AF,
16 0))) /
17 PKG_UF_BANK.FN_GETDAYS('20120101', '20121217') AVG
18 from t_pm_acct_dtl_af t1
19 where 1 = 1
20 and t1.data_date in ('20120101', '20121217')
21 and acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT'
22 and t1.cur_code = 1
23 and substr(flag, 1, 1) = '1'
24 and substr(flag, 4, 1) = '1'
25 and t1.dept1_code <> '999999999'
26 group by acct_no_pk) t1,
27 (select
28 t3.acct_no_pk as acct_no_pk,
29 NVL(t2.cm_code, nvl(T3.MGR_CODE, 'xxxxxx')) as mgr_code,
30 decode(T1.SHARE_RATE, '', 100, T1.SHARE_RATE) as share_rate
31 from t_pm_acct_dtl t3,
32 bap_cm_account t1,
33 bap_cm_psndoc t2,
34 bap_nctobapdept t4
35 where 1 = 1
36 and t1.account(+) = t3.acct_no_pk
37 and decode(t1.seal_flag(+), '', 'N', t1.seal_flag(+)) = 'N'
38 and replace(t1.effect_date(+), '-') <= '20121217'
39 and replace(decode(t1.seal_date(+),
40 '',
41 pkg_uf_bank.FN_GETNEXTDAY('20121217',
42 'M'),
43 t1.seal_date(+)),
44 '-') > '20121217'
45 and decode(t1.dr(+), '', 0, t1.dr(+)) = 0
46 and t1.pk_cm_psndoc = t2
47 .pk_cm_psndoc(+)
48 and decode(t2.dr(+), '', 0, t2.dr(+)) = 0
49 and t2.pk_dept = t4.pk_nctobapdept(+)
50 and t4.deptcode(+) <> '999999999'
51 and t3.data_date = '20121217'
52 and t3.acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT') t2
53 Where t1.acct_no_pk = t2.acct_no_pk
54 group by t2.mgr_code) b
55 where a.mgr_code = b.mgr_code
56 and a.dept1_code <> '999999999'
57 and a.dept1_code = '18605'
58 and a.unit3_code = '18601'
59 and 1 = 1
60 and a.mgr_code IN ('00798', '00817')
61 order by 1, 3, 5
62 ; Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 74438866 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 150 | 19483 (14)| 00:00:57 | | |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 150 | 19483 (14)| 00:00:57 | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 150 | 19482 (14)| 00:00:57 | | |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 115 | 8086 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
| 4 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | | | |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| S_PM_MGR_DEPT_RELA | 1 | 63 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MGR_DEPT_RELA_IDX5 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 7 | VIEW | | 12519 | 635K| 8082 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 12519 | 2322K| 8082 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_NCTOBAPDEPT | 609 | 18270 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 10 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 12519 | 1956K| 8077 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 84 | 4284 | 33 (10)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 13 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 629K| 65M| 8021 (12)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 1 | 68 | 5627 (12)| 00:00:17 | | |
| 15 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 629K| 24M| 2370 (13)| 00:00:07 | KEY | KEY |
|* 16 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL | 629K| 24M| 2370 (13)| 00:00:07 | 352 | 352 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 18 | HASH GROUP BY | | 93 | 5487 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 19 | PARTITION LIST INLIST | | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL_AF | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("T1"."ACCT_NO_PK"="T2"."ACCT_NO_PK")
3 - access("A"."MGR_CODE"="T2"."MGR_CODE")
5 - filter("A"."DEPT1_CODE"='18605' AND "A"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999')
6 - access("A"."UNIT3_CODE"='18601' AND ("A"."MGR_CODE"='00798' OR "A"."MGR_CODE"='00817'))
8 - access("T2"."PK_DEPT"="T4"."PK_NCTOBAPDEPT"(+))
9 - filter("T4"."DEPTCODE"(+)<>'999999999')
10 - filter(NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00798' OR
NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00817')
11 - access("T1"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"="T2"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"(+))
12 - filter(DECODE(TO_CHAR("T2"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T2"."DR"(+))=0)
13 - access("T1"."ACCOUNT"(+)="T3"."ACCT_NO_PK")
14 - filter(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+),'','N',"T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+))='N' AND
REPLACE("T1"."EFFECT_DATE"(+),'-')<='20121217' AND DECODE(TO_CHAR("T1"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T1"."DR"(+))=0 AND
REPLACE(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+),'',"PKG_UF_BANK"."FN_GETNEXTDAY"('20121217','M'),"T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+)),'-')>
'20121217')
16 - filter("T3"."ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT')
20 - filter("ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",1,1)='1' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",4,1)='1' AND
"T1"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999' AND TO_NUMBER("T1"."CUR_CODE")=1) Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
154 recursive calls
0 db block gets
193327 consistent gets
13545 physical reads
692 redo size
1064 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1649 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed
利用no_merge优化的更多相关文章
- Android中利用ViewHolder优化自定义Adapter的典型写法
利用ViewHolder优化自定义Adapter的典型写法 最近写Adapter写得多了,慢慢就熟悉了. 用ViewHolder,主要是进行一些性能优化,减少一些不必要的重复操作.(WXD同学教我的. ...
- 利用Gulp优化部署Web项目[长文慎入]
Gulp Gulp是一款项目自动化的构建工具,与Grunt一样可以通过创建任务(Task)来帮助我们自动完成一些工作流的内容.当然,今天我们的内容并不是讨论这二者的区别,仅仅是介绍介绍如何利用Gulp ...
- 【转】利用TCMalloc优化Nginx的性能
From: http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2013-04/83197.html TCMalloc的全称是 Thread-Caching Malloc,是谷歌开发的开源工具 ...
- 利用Select2优化@Html.ListBoxFor显示，学会用MultiSelectList
最近需要用到多选框,Asp.Net MVC自带的@Html.ListBox或@Html.ListBoxFor的显示效果太差,于是找到了Select2进行优化,并正式了解了多选框的操作方法. 首先介绍多 ...
- MySQL如何利用索引优化ORDER BY排序语句
MySQL索引通常是被用于提高WHERE条件的数据行匹配或者执行联结操作时匹配其它表的数据行的搜索速度. MySQL也能利用索引来快速地执行ORDER BY和GROUP BY语句的排序和分组操作. 通 ...
- MySQL如何利用索引优化ORDER BY排序语句 【转载】
本文转载自:http://blog.csdn.net/ryb7899/article/details/5580624 .感谢相关作者. MySQL索引通常是被用于提高WHERE条件的数据行匹配或者执 ...
- shellcode在栈溢出中的利用与优化
0x00 前言 在<Windows Shellcode学习笔记——shellcode的提取与测试>中介绍了如何对shellcode作初步优化,动态获取Windows API地址并调用,并通 ...
- 利用jsPerf优化Web应用的性能
在前端开发的过程中,掌握好浏览器的特性进行有针对性的性能调优是一项基本工作,jsperf.com是一个用来发布基于HTML的针对性能比较的测试用例的网站,你可以在jsPerf上在线填写和运行测试用例, ...
- MySQL如何利用索引优化ORDER BY排序语
MySQL索引通常是被用于提高WHERE条件的数据行匹配或者执行联结操作时匹配其它表的数据行的搜索速度. MySQL也能利用索引来快速地执行ORDER BY和GROUP BY语句的排序和分组操作. 通 ...
随机推荐
- Objective-C 内存管理与高级环境编程 阅读分享
常用的调试私有API uintptr_t objc_rootRetainCount(id obj) _objc_autoreleasePoolPrint();//查看自动释放池中的对象 LLVM cl ...
- The hacker's sanbox游戏
第一关:使用/usr/hashcat程序,对passwd中root的密码进行解密,得到gravity98 执行su,输入密码gravity98. 第二关:获取提供的工具,wget http://are ...
- c语言学习之基础知识点介绍（五）：关系运算式和逻辑运算式
本节主要说关系运算式和逻辑运算式. 一.关系运算式 1.等于(==):判断左边的表达式是否等于右边的表达式 2.大于(>):判断左边的表达式是否大于右边的表达式 3.大于等于(>=):判断 ...
- javascript-图片横向无缝隙滚动(可在服务器运行)
前两次弄'图片横向滚动'javascript,在本地上运行得很美,可是一上到我们学校后台的服务器,就有很多问题,这个算是行的了. css代码: <style type="text/cs ...
- Ubuntu下Hadoop快速安装手册
http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2012-02/53106.htm 一.环境 Ubuntu 10.10+jdk1.6 二.下载&安装程序 1.1 Apache Ha ...
- PL/SQL常见设置--Kevin的专栏
body { font-family: "Microsoft YaHei UI","Microsoft YaHei",SimSun,"Segoe UI ...
- 转： angularjs 指令中动态编译的方法(适用于有异步请求的情况) 内嵌指令无效
angular的坑很多 例子: 在directive的link中有一个$http请求,当请求完成后根据返回的值动态做element.append('......');这个操作, 能显示没问题,可问题是 ...
- Codeforces 553D Nudist Beach(图论,贪心)
Solution: 假设已经选了所有的点. 如果从中删掉一个点,那么其它所有点的分值只可能减少或者不变. 如果要使若干步删除后最小的分值变大,那么删掉的点集中肯定要包含当前分值最小的点. 所以每次删掉 ...
- php 连接mysql数据库并显示数据 实例 转载
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/ ...
- 网络基础---OSI 模型与TCP/IP
一.网络的演进: 1.简单的联接:1960's ------------ 1970's Host Network 六十至七十年代,网络的概念主要是主机架构的低速串行联接,提供应用程序执行.远程打 ...