4.7.6 Compaction of LR Parsing Tables A typical programming language grammar with 50 to 100 terminals and 100 productions may have an LALR parsing table with several hundred states. The action function may easily have 20,000 entries, each requiring a…
4.7.3 Canonical LR(1) Parsing Tables We now give the rules for constructing the LR(1) ACTION and GOTO functions from the sets of LR(1) items. These functions are represented by a table, as before. The only difference is in the values of the entries.…
4.7.5 Efficient Construction of LALR Parsing Tables There are several modifications we can make to Algorithm 4.59 to avoid constructing the full collection of sets of LR(1) items in the process of creating an LALR(1) parsing table. First, we can repr…
4.7.4 Constructing LALR Parsing Tables We now introduce our last parser construction method, the LALR (lookahead-LR) technique. This method is often used in practice, because the tables obtained by it are considerably smaller than the canonical LR ta…
4.4 Top-Down Parsing Top-down parsing can be viewed as the problem of constructing a parse tree for the input string, starting from the root and creating the nodes of the parse tree in preorder (depth-first, as discussed in Section 2.3.4). Equivalent…
原文链接:https://www.cs.uic.edu/~spopuri/cparser.html Satya Kiran PopuriGraduate StudentUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicago, IL 60607spopur2 [at] uic [dot] eduWed Sep 13 12:24:25 CDT 2006 Table of Contents Introduction Prerequisites The LR Parser An…
4.8 Using Ambiguous Grammars It is a fact that every ambiguous grammar fails to be LR and thus is not in any of the classes of grammars discussed in the previous two sections. However, certain types of ambiguous grammars are quite useful in the speci…
Chapter 12 Lexer and parser generators (ocamllex, ocamlyacc) This chapter describes two program generators: ocamllex, that produces a lexical analyzer from a set of regular expressions with associated semantic actions, and ocamlyacc, that produces a…